Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
John S  
#1 Posted : 08 April 2011 15:52:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
John S

Looking for a good example of a PAT testing regime for homeworkers. We currently have 340 homeworker staff this number is due to increase to over 400 by the end of the year and the current system of using in house staff to carry out the PAT testing is not working. Do you have a large number of homeworkers and if so how do you cover the PAT testing.
PIKEMAN  
#2 Posted : 08 April 2011 15:56:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PIKEMAN

Depending on the equipment involved they could be trained to check themselves? PAT testing can involve just a visual examination, plus removing the plug cover and that checking the wiring is correct. Not all PAT testing involves fancy equipment nor do you have to be an electrician - merely competent to a level apropriate to what you are doing.
Murray18822  
#3 Posted : 08 April 2011 15:57:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Murray18822

Why can't your company just give some basic instructions on the visual inspection of appliances? doubt if the appliances are going very far.
bilbo  
#4 Posted : 08 April 2011 16:13:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bilbo

Depends on what type of homeworking your people are involved in. If it is just "office" type work around using a PC the recommended frequency for checking is 5 years if memory serves. Other than user checks before each use - why would you need to do anything more. I am with Murray - simple instruction on how to carry out a user check should suffice.
firesafety101  
#5 Posted : 08 April 2011 20:24:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I am also in Murray's corner, PAT is not required, user checks are and if carried out and recorded that is all that is required.
Ron Hunter  
#6 Posted : 08 April 2011 23:52:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Have to disagree with Pikeman above. I would positively discourage people from removing plug tops. They've no real reason to do so, and this merely increases the likelihood of the ill-informed doing something silly. If you're only talking IT equipment, a 5 year cycle is more than adequate. Add PAT testing to maintenance schedules, or be extra bold and don't do it at all. There is no "legal" requirement other than to maintain equipment in safe condition.
paul mc  
#7 Posted : 09 April 2011 00:00:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
paul mc

totally agree with ron H
chris.packham  
#8 Posted : 09 April 2011 08:04:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Regarding removal of plug tops, most IT equipment comes with sealed plugs that cannot be opened up. When we supply equipment to our customers (for skin condition monitoring) the mains leads all have sealed plugs. Chris
Dave C  
#9 Posted : 09 April 2011 20:36:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Dave C

Reading this topic with interest - our organisation own a couple of properties and we have tenancy agreements with some of our employees. i.e. accommodation forms part of their employment "package". The subject has arisen as to what would be appropriate PAT as part of a tenancy agreement ? It really doesn't seem appropriate to me that we should be testing every piece of equipment they introduce into their accommodation. Grateful for your thoughts.
Kate  
#10 Posted : 11 April 2011 09:48:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

The usual arrangement in domestic tenancies is that the landlord is responsible for safety checks on all equipment supplied with the accommodation but not for the tenant's own equipment.
Ken Slack  
#11 Posted : 11 April 2011 10:06:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ken Slack

Hi John, A bit of a conundrum mate, remember that you need to be able to 'prove' that you are maintaining the equipment, a friend of mine recently had a house fire due to faulty wiring of an electric appliance, lost everything. He works from home and the insurance company are now very interested his Electricity at Work provision.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.