Rank: Forum user
|
Looking for a good example of a PAT testing regime for homeworkers. We currently have 340 homeworker staff this number is due to increase to over 400 by the end of the year and the current system of using in house staff to carry out the PAT testing is not working. Do you have a large number of homeworkers and if so how do you cover the PAT testing.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Depending on the equipment involved they could be trained to check themselves? PAT testing can involve just a visual examination, plus removing the plug cover and that checking the wiring is correct.
Not all PAT testing involves fancy equipment nor do you have to be an electrician - merely competent to a level apropriate to what you are doing.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Why can't your company just give some basic instructions on the visual inspection of appliances? doubt if the appliances are going very far.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Depends on what type of homeworking your people are involved in. If it is just "office" type work around using a PC the recommended frequency for checking is 5 years if memory serves. Other than user checks before each use - why would you need to do anything more. I am with Murray - simple instruction on how to carry out a user check should suffice.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am also in Murray's corner, PAT is not required, user checks are and if carried out and recorded that is all that is required.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Have to disagree with Pikeman above. I would positively discourage people from removing plug tops. They've no real reason to do so, and this merely increases the likelihood of the ill-informed doing something silly. If you're only talking IT equipment, a 5 year cycle is more than adequate. Add PAT testing to maintenance schedules, or be extra bold and don't do it at all. There is no "legal" requirement other than to maintain equipment in safe condition.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Regarding removal of plug tops, most IT equipment comes with sealed plugs that cannot be opened up. When we supply equipment to our customers (for skin condition monitoring) the mains leads all have sealed plugs.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Reading this topic with interest - our organisation own a couple of properties and we have tenancy agreements with some of our employees. i.e. accommodation forms part of their employment "package". The subject has arisen as to what would be appropriate PAT as part of a tenancy agreement ? It really doesn't seem appropriate to me that we should be testing every piece of equipment they introduce into their accommodation. Grateful for your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The usual arrangement in domestic tenancies is that the landlord is responsible for safety checks on all equipment supplied with the accommodation but not for the tenant's own equipment.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi John,
A bit of a conundrum mate, remember that you need to be able to 'prove' that you are maintaining the equipment, a friend of mine recently had a house fire due to faulty wiring of an electric appliance, lost everything. He works from home and the insurance company are now very interested his Electricity at Work provision.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.