IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Hydrostatic Testing of refurbished fire extinguishers
Rank: New forum user
|
I am concerned that aluminium alloy 6061 pressure vessels are being subjected to a paint drying process after their hydrostatic test, possibly reaching a temperature of 140 degrees C? My questions are:
Is the pressure test invalidated?
Is the integrity of the vessel affected by the temperature?
Comments gratefully received.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In metallurgical terms, that's a very low temperature, not going to affect crystaline structure etc. I personally wouldn't be concerned. I speak as a mere qualified mechanical production and design engineer.
Maybe there's a qualified metallurgist amidst our ranks who can confirm...........
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
as an x [in my youth etc.] -fabrication and welding engineer I agree with Ron
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am a bit more cautious, as a quick search on Google reveals this to be a precipitation hardening aluminium alloy.
The temperature at which these alloys reach (or over-reach) their optimum strength is very variable, and for some the temperature is quite low.
I will see if I can find out a bit more tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Precipitation hardening temperature for a typical 6061 Al alloy is at 160 deg Celsius.
I would say perilously close to your 140 deg Celsius paint curing temperature.
You will need to seek professional advice on this one I suspect.
My gut feeling is that it will undertake metallurgical changes.
You should be able to assess this by destructive testing of 2 samples to get an initial feel.
One prior to paint curing and one after, polished and etched samples should show any structural changes, also you would then have two sacrificial bodies and you could undertake perhaps a tensile and impact test on them.
A good materials lab should be able to do this for you easily and provide a report on any changes.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
And a good metallurgist would give you the answer straight-off. This artificial aging process takes many hours. How long is the paint drying process?
Irrespective of that, the seam weld will have its own micro-structure.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Paul has given an excellent answer. I would suggest a check on a sample of material before and after the curing process. A hardness test is probably the simplest indicator of whether the ageing has been compromised.
How long ageing takes is strongly dependent on the temperature and the alloy. In this case we are concerned about over-ageing, where the strength can drop sharply. The majority of the strength in the weld region is likely to be lost during welding, and is recovered by fresh heat treatment.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
PS I would check the hardness of the weld material, the parent material and the heat affected zone as well.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Whilst not wishing to condemn without the full details may I ask why a company is undertaking such work without the competence re metallurgy to hand?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Our discussion here may be moot.
Where the extinguishers are refurbished, they will presumably still require to be supplied as BS EN 3 compliant.
That standard states that hydrostatic type-testing is to be conducted on finished, painted, articles.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Hydrostatic Testing of refurbished fire extinguishers
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.