Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
PTH  
#1 Posted : 24 August 2011 11:15:04(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
PTH

Simple question.

When it comes to HSE related training (excluding specialist training) do you favour internal or external delivery and why?
Ron Hunter  
#2 Posted : 24 August 2011 12:18:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Define "specialist training" ?!

What matters most is the (a) competency & resources (b) enthusiasm (c) ability to motivate.
Often difficult to find a people with all 3!
Jane Blunt  
#3 Posted : 24 August 2011 12:21:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

To Ron's answer I would add

d) a knowledge of the employer's systems and ability to make training to mesh them

That is why I usually favour in-house training. For example I want my fire wardens to know how we operate our fire evacuation procedures HERE, not in some supermarket.
bod212  
#4 Posted : 24 August 2011 12:39:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bod212

All our asbestos training is done in-house (and that is specialist, is it not?). The guy who does our region most definitely fulfills a), b), c) & d).
PTH  
#5 Posted : 24 August 2011 14:17:30(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
PTH

By specialist I mean higher level or externally accredited (BOHS, NEBOSH etc.).

I understand the need for the trainer (internal or external) to be competent, enthusiastic etc. but assuming you had the option which would you go for and why?
Ron Hunter  
#6 Posted : 24 August 2011 15:17:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

IF I had the resources, then in-house would be preferred. As stated, the ability to tailor learning to your own Organisation, systems and arrangements is a big plus.
Of course there are some very good external providers who will take the time to do that for you too.

Bigger than that though is the luxury of first-hand interraction and feedback from your own people. More useful and informative than any audit, employee consultation process or behavioural safety programme.

Not only do you get to know about them and their attitudes, skills, understanding and beliefs etc., they get to know you.

Confidentiality of the training environment must be preserved though.

The big dilemma of course is one of resource. Resource to be a trainer, or to be an adviser, auditor, investigator, systems and arrangements designer, etc etc.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.