Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
mtaylor  
#1 Posted : 20 October 2011 21:36:25(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mtaylor

During recent inspections with clients I have come across 2 cases that I think sohuld be subject to LOLER inspection and controls but can not find specific mention on L113 1) is the tipping body on a small collection vehicle e.g. type with a cage at the back for collecting rubbish and scrap 2) in the arm of an excavator shovel Should these be subject to inspection and where would we source a competent inspector? Is there a list provided anywhere that deals with items that may be required undr LOLER but are not obvious candidates?
RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 20 October 2011 22:12:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I am not an authority on lifting equipment, however I will try to give an answer. 1) No, I do not believe this is LOLER applicable. It would, however, still fall under the ambit of PUWER and therefore would need to be inspected and maintained so that it is fit for purpose. 2) The arm of an excavator is an integral part of the excavator. Hence it would be subject to a thorough inspection along with any other individual parts of the machine pursuant to LOLER. I suspect that there is not a definitive list of equipment as the list could potentially be huge. I suggest you speak to a supplier of plant who will provide you will details or advise who to speak with.
Ron Hunter  
#3 Posted : 20 October 2011 23:22:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

A potentially useful reference at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/lau/lacs/90-4.htm Beware though of placing too much trust in LAC documents, the HSE are under no obligation to keep this published information up-to-date. (Note the review date on this document). I think it may answer most of your queries.
Clairel  
#4 Posted : 21 October 2011 09:47:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

I agree with Ray on this: 1) It's primary function is not to lift. 2) It's primary function is to lift. No definitive list as it would not be possible IMO. I look at two aspects when trying to decided: Is it's primary function to lift (or be an accessory to a lift) What is the risk level (for example pallet trucks are not included becuase of the low level of risk if fails).
alistair.r.reid  
#5 Posted : 22 October 2011 00:31:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
alistair.r.reid

I agree with the other comments regarding point one. With regard to point two I am not quite sure whether you are refering to a loading shovel or excavator. An excavator is only deemed to require examination under LOLER if it is to be used for cranage duties, ie equiped with a suitable lifting point eye, hook or fork attachment and other equipment so as to satisfy regulation 7 of LOLER. Excavators not so equipped fitted with a bucket are for excavation duties which are not considered to be a lifting operation and as such fall under the auspices of PUWER. http://www.hse.gov.uk/co...ction/faq-excavators.htm Similarly a loading shovel is only covered by loler if fitted with a suitable lifting point or forks, use with a bucket for movement of spoil, grain etc is not considered to be a lifting operation.
alistair.r.reid  
#6 Posted : 22 October 2011 00:41:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
alistair.r.reid

The safety assessment federation (Safed) produce a list of items requiring examination under LOLER (MLCC 03) and similar guidance for PUWER (MLCC 05) which are freely available at: http://safed.co.uk/techn...achinery-lift-and-crane/
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.