IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
RIDDOR OR NOT RIDDOR, THAT IS THE QUESTION??
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi all
A situation has occured as follows. Guy stands up from his chair and strains his back. I have not yet conducted an enquiry as to ascertain if there was pre existing conditions. The DSE set up is appropriate, and so is the surrounding location, floor etc...
He has been signed off for over 3 days.
Would this be deemed as RIDDOR reportable?
Further info- He was not carrying out any work activities but was at work.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Hello Jarsmith83
I believe it's a RIDDOR accident because it happened while he was at work.
Another scenario you can use to judge will be if a visitor comes to your workplace and get's injured and s/he is off work for 3+ days. The injured worker's employer will have to report it even though the injury didn't happen in the employer's workplace.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ade wrote:Hello Jarsmith83
I believe it's a RIDDOR accident because it happened while he was at work.
Another scenario you can use to judge will be if a visitor comes to your workplace and get's injured and s/he is off work for 3+ days. The injured worker's employer will have to report it even though the injury didn't happen in the employer's workplace.
Hope this helps. Yes this was my conclusion. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
But the incident did not happpen due to a "work activity"!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
David H wrote:But the incident did not happpen due to a "work activity"! David - This iswhat has made me reluctant to report it!! Any further clarification on this. He was working on his computer just before he stood up and pulled his back. Your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I do not see standing up as being linked to the work activity - you state that the dse set up is ok and surrounding location is ok - so unless there is some other factor I am missing here not RIDDOR reportable. Just because he was in the workplace does not make this reportable. Had he strained his back because the chair was unsuitable not trained in dse set up etc then a totally different scenario.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In work? Then a work related activity as far as I can see.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Sorry to disagree. David H has made the key comment. Where's the link to a work activity? So far it doesn't look like there is one. So it's non-reportable. For the head-shakers and doubters out there I'd ask you when you last had a ferret round the HSE web site on this topic. They are seeking to get RIDDOR back on track, like it was intended to be. Go and browse http://www.hse.gov.uk/ri.../do-i-need-to-report.htm before you come back at me.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I agree with David and Jim not related to a work activity or work equipment, environment so not reportable.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
'At or in connection with work'? - Yes (at work - also at workstation).
Off work or unable to carry out normal duties for 3 days or more? Yes.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
From the info provided not connected - not reportable
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Does having passionate sex in the post room at work count as work activity? What if the couple then fall off the table causing >3 day injuries?
The answers to these questions may give something to think about to posters who say if it happens in the workplace it's reportable.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Another vote for no here.
This is an example for the HSE's own site An employee steps out of his private car in the office car park. In doing so, he somehow twists his ankle. As a result he has more than 3 days off work. The employee had not yet started work for the day. There were no defects to the car park surface, debris or spillages etc. present that may have contributed to the incident and the light was good.
No. Provided that there was nothing about the condition and design of the car park surface, condition, slope, weather conditions, lighting etc which contributed to the accident. This is not reportable because, on the face of it, the accident that resulted in the injury did not arise out of, nor was it connected to the work activity. Note - If the employee was “not at work” then their employer might still have to report the injury if the employee, who was not at work, was taken from the place of the accident to a hospital for treatment. The “accident” must still have arisen out of, or be connected with the work activity though – so if the injured person put their foot in a pot hole and twisted their ankle, then it might be reportable, if they had just stepped awkwardly out of the car, then not.
I would see standing up from a chair as a similar type incident.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sorry but the wording is "arising out of in connection with work" not "at" I still do not see how standing up from the information we have been provided with can be classed as in connection with work - so I still think not reportable.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
And the 3 key tests I have always been given are:
The manner of conducting an undertaking....No. The plant or substances used.......No. The condition of the premises.......No.
Report it.....if the answer to the above is No then No.
p48
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sorry to disagree with the numerous posts on this topic. The guy was within the confines of his work place doing something at a desk with a computer, that sounds like a work activity to me. The fact that it may or may not be a RIDDOR reportable is not really an issue, why not report it to on the safe side. There is no cost or possible litigation that could arise from this and you would also be on the right side of the law. My view is that it happened at work so is reportable. Jarsmith is there any more information you can provide on this for a better juddgement to be given?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Not riddor. He stood up and got a back pain. It could have happened on his sofa at home.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
From the information provided it is a RIDDOR IMO
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
IMO it is reportable, in fact I’m struggling to understand why people think it is not.
For example, an employee is sat at a desk transferring information from a document onto a computer. The employee finishes, stands up takes the paperwork across the office and puts it into a filing cabinet, walks back and sits down again at the computer.
At what point do people feel the employee stopped working ?.
Example two, employee completes work on computer and turns it off, stands, takes their coat off a stand, walks down a corridor, down some stairs, walks through a reception area and swipes out at the front door then walks on to the street. However during the walk through reception their boss stops them and asked a question, which they discuss for 10 minutes.
At what point do people feel the employee stopped working ?.
My understanding is that the Health and Safety at work act includes access and egress to place of work. So surly while traveling to your work station / area is connected to the activities you undertake on behalf of the organisation. ? You have to move about or how else could you do your work. In the example of the post room, I think that is referred to as “on a frolic of their own” quite literally and so not work related.
From the above link to HSE web site, the guidance L73 on page 22 item 36 states :- Determining if an accident is reportable under RIDDOR does not depend on apportioning blame. The broad meaning of ‘arising out of or in connection with work’ means that an accident may still be reportable even if there had been no breach of health and safety law and no one was clearly to blame. I note the new guidance also states the same thing. Unfortunately there is a lack of good examples of what would not need to be reported (IMO), a lot would be gained by more guidance not less. The point here is that is does not matter if everything is as it should be in the working area.
Happy for someone to try and convince me otherwise on this, but I feel it should be reported.
Personally I look forward to the day that I can be sat at my kitchen table having just finished my cereal, were I can push a button and dematerialise from the kitchen and rematerialize still in the sitting position at my desk (appropriately clothed). This would cut out all the walking up/ down stairs, along corridors and sitting down, which eventually employers may consider is not working and therefore dock people’s wages. I don’t think we are quite there yet!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
"Arising out of or in connection with work" implies a causative link that is much stronger than mere presence. Whether or not there's any breach is immaterial and refined debate on whether or not the person is to be considered at work is largely a red herring (leave those examples for m'learned friends). Focus on the questions that pete48 posed at posting 15 above; they're as good as any at gaining an understanding of the presence or absence of that causative link and hence reportability.
Not every incident is reportable and this is one that isn't.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Hi all I think it is reportable the person was at his work station part of that being his chair surely accsess and egress from the chiar must come into it
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Similar incidents have been debated a 1000 times - make a decision based on your accident investigation - ensure why based on the fact you have determined, you did not report the matter. Use the criteria Pete 48 has posted to help you.
If in the future you need to justify your decision you will have this information to hand as part of your investigation.
I have produced a form for my investigations which I use for such accidents (mainly members of the public incidents) - if you want a copy let me know?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This is reportable, seeing the accident happened at work, review your workstation DSE assessment, and see if you need to implement any changes,
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It's absolutely right that the accident investigation should determine whether this is a RIDDOR or not. However, based on the statement that 'The DSE set up is appropriate, and so is the surrounding location, floor etc...' it is likely that no changes will be made to the workplace/equipment. If we go down the route of reporting every event just because it happened in the workplace the HSE will have no meaningful data and will end up like OSHA. To this extent you would be expected to report an individual who trips over the sill exiting their own car just because they land on the businesses car park.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Bob S (post 16) has given what I would agree is very sensible advice and I would also advise it is reportable.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Don't you just love RIDDOR! IMO there was no accident and therefore not reportable.
From the RIDDOR website: Key elements and exemptions in the duty to report deaths and injuries Regulation 3 ... requires three key elements before deaths and injuries must be reported:
There must have been an accident (this is a distinct, adverse event that is external to the deceased or injured person, and was unintended).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Two points:-
Firstly, neither RIDDOR nor OSHA Recording Rule were promulgated for benchmarking personal safety performance of organisations nor for the purpose of recording for civil claims. They were simply meant to be the means through which the national regulatory/enforcement bodies would get information and focus on the more serious and also as a means of analysing trends etc (statistics) for policy direction etc.
Secondly, there will always be a grey area for soft tissue injury that cannot be proved either way as there is not physical evidence such as a cut or a bruise!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I agree with the opinion that there is not much wrong with the H&S Legislation, it is the way some wish to interpret it. Let common sense prevail.
No it is not reportable Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I continually read L73 over and over when trying to determine if incidents are reportable, particularly those involving school pupils. My view is that this is not RIDDOR. Though not included in the RIDDOR guidance as one of the factors to assist in making the decision, one that I always ask myself is - what benefit would the information be to the HSE in assessing an organisation's management of h & s?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
NOT reportable. No more relevant to RIDDOR than choking on my sandwich, putting your back out tying your shoe lace, or injury sustained as a result of a violent sneeze.
Keep it real, and remember the overarching purpose of RIDDOR.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Your investigation may help you further to determine facts.
I personally would accept that an employee who is required to work at a DSE workstation is generally "at work". If he stood up as it is required to do so "out of and in conection with work" , it is difficult to contend that he is not at work.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Its not just safety managers who debate this matter - I have had many with regulators too - in a recent matter I took it to the policy writers at the HSE who agreed with me!!!
If anyone can correct me please do so - I have never seen a prosecution for a none reported incident of the nature of an over three day lost time back injury - in most cases of prosecution under RIDDOR they form part of a bigger offence and non compliance piggy backs on the bigger charge.
I mean lets take this incident and use it with the info we have - the gent stands up in his chair and his back goes - the incident in investigated and a decision is not to report it because there is nothing wrong with the chair, the environments its being used in or the management arrangements - providing you have taken into consideration the facts and made your decision on sound judgment - you need not worry about anything.
I think you are on terra firma not to report this incident - PS for completeness I have just ran it by a Local Authority who I'm in negotiations with to form a Primary Authority Partnership - they would not expect an F2508 for such an incident but they get many like it where people are over reporting as a precaution.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
I have to comment that he is at work, he is using company work equipment, although he is using it incorrectly he has sustained an injury...
It should be reported.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
My vote is a "no".
In a previous life when investigating accidents we posed the question "did anything untoward occur?"
If the answer was no, then we used to class it as "information only" for our own records & certainly would not have reported it.
As previously stated by Ron Hunter, also ask yourself why RIDDOR is there in the first place - it certainly isn't to capture these types of "accidents"!
Zyggy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
What's wrong with everyone?
The person was at work so report it as a three day injury?
Question: has anyone been prosecuted for reporting an accident? I don't know the answer but I doubt it very much.
Has anyone been prosecuted for not reporting an accident? DEFINATELY YES!
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
The question is simple!!! Investigate the persons background. Was there other reasons for his back to ache at that particular moment? What had he been doing the night before or that weekend? Had he done some heavy lifting? Overstretching (painting, clearing gutter out, moving machine machine, gardening or anything strenuous)? Had he had back trouble before? Has he a medical back problem that his/her manager doesn't know about? Investigate properly then decide if other things could have contributed to his back ache. This would lead you to whether it was at work or not. Causation is the master word here and it might be that the cause initially was already there before he even started work. Food for thought - hope this helps.
Paddywack56
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
When did this happen?
He has been to see his GP who has signed him off. He will be away from his normal job for more than three days.
How many days have you left to get the report in?
Better be quick?
Just wait for the letter from his solicitor, then your solicitor, then explain why this was not reported under RIDDOR
Take care now!
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Well this is really confusing… Here we all are H&S Practitioners and we can’t agree on the correct course of action, half on yes report it half on no don’t report it. Is there any hope for us?
I’m still a yes report it.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
RIDDOR OR NOT RIDDOR, THAT IS THE QUESTION??
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.