Rank: Forum user
|
Hello,
If you work from home and you use your own or work equipment do they both have to be PAT tested?
Thanks
Katie
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
No - in short although they will have to have a visual inspection
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
No statute law requirement for PAT.
How can there be employer responsibility for employees equipment which they know nothing about and have no control over?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
paul.skyrme wrote:No statute law requirement for PAT.
How can there be employer responsibility for employees equipment which they know nothing about and have no control over?
But the employer is required to maintain it.
“Home working” can cover quite a range of activities and for some equipment provided by employers, complying with the requirement to ensure work equipment is maintained in a safe condition may be best met by testing (of course visual inspection – often by the home worker – would be appropriate in many instances).
You might find this HSE Research Report, “Health and safety of homeworkers:
Good practice case studies” of some interest.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr262.pdf
There's probably more information available on the HSE website.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
barnaby,
Your points are valid, however, does this stretch to the home workers kettle, and other kitchen appliances?
At work these would be covered by the workplace legislation.
At home their kettle for example could be lethal, however, they use this for making their brew during their paid tea break and kill themselves by electrocution, would the employer be liable as they were at work, but working from home using a piece of equipment which would have been provided perhaps in the workplace, but not at home, and to make a brew at work would be acceptable.
So why not at home, but is the home workers kettle relevant?...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
I took the OPs wording 'your own or work equipment' to mean both the employees own equipment or that supplied by the employer.
Although these days the vast majority of home workers are doing office work at home the term does also cover higher risk work at home and this can involve equipment which might require testing.
I'm not sure about kettles and normal household equipment being used while the householder is 'at work'. I wouldn't expect PA testing. Maybe providing information eg how to visually inspect, but that so often descends into stating the bleedin' obvious and bottom covering.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Interesting debate.
I work at home and out and about.
I use PC, printer, laminator, various battery chargers, radio, kettle, toaster, grill- all my own stuff and I take my lap top with me when away.
Where do I stand as I am self employed?
I have a risk assessment on my lone working and my risk to people I meet.
Oh by the way I have an employee - my wife. She also uses all of the above.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This where the word 'sensible' applies. There is no need for an employer to PAT appliances for home workers, or indeed at work if they choose not to do so. Sensible precautions for using the home as a part-time office would only extend to ensuring the equipment is fit for purpose. Those working from home are much safer than other employees who travel to work - end of RA.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
We had this problem when I was SO1 QS for a local gov office.
As it was 'work' but home based we had to ensure that the computer was used in a safe environment i.e. Plugged into a safe electrical point. So to that effect we sent one of our electrical inspectors over to test the circuit that was to be used (along with the electrical installation of the house). It was found that the wiring of the house was, how shall I put this, DANGEROUS, YEP, THAT'S THE WORD. No earth bonding, no cpc to the socket and 50% of the wiring was reversed polarity.
If follows then that working from home in this case was a non started as we had a duty of care.
Last time I looked, the home is one of the most dangerous places to work.
Rob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Zimmy I agree - how many short cuts do we take just because we are at home?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Zimmy, did you do the same thing for all those third party sites and motorway service stations where employees plug into a third party supply?
Just an idle weekend thought.
p48
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hmmm...whatever happened to sensible safety? One household out of tens or even hundreds of thousands which are used intermittently for office days. The risk would have been just the same had the person NOT been working from home - I despair.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Keep it idle Pete. Those buildings you talk about are quite separate as you well know.
And Ray, don't go on about something you seem to have no idea about. Spend 15 years on electrical inspections and then talk about electrical installations. As a point of interest, when did you have your home electrical system tested? The point is Ray, we had a duty of care. What you or anyone risks at home is your business. I just hope you don't put others (children etc) at risk by ignorance.
We tested three homes as it happened and not one of them passed the inspections. So please dear mods don't take my toys away!
Just an Idle thought.
No offence intended.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Don't worry zimmy I'm too thick skinned to be offended...and you're right, I know nowt about electrical installations, but I do know about risk management.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
and so do I Ray, electrical at any rate :-)
Rob
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.