Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
redken  
#1 Posted : 23 February 2012 09:38:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
redken

http://www.iosh.co.uk/ne...ng_against_football.aspx While it almost certainly safer to sit than stand, I would suggest that the worst of all scenarios is mass standing in seated areas, as happens with all away fans in the Premier division.
mylesfrancis  
#2 Posted : 24 February 2012 15:08:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

What I really don't like about this press release is that the survey asked a question about crowd surges at sporting AND music events, yet the results are seemingly used to justify the call for not reintroducing terracing at football matches. The sample is said to be 3,000 people who have attended a major sports or music event in the last 5 years. I'd like to know what the definition of "major" event is? What analysis was done of the location of the reported surges, i.e. were people reporting surges in a seated venue? Is any weighting given to peoples' perceptions of what a "crowd surge" is, rather than the simple ebb and flow of a crowd? Indeed there has been no recurrence of the tragic events at Hillsborough, but we mustn't overlook the fact that there were fences at the front of those terraces which prevented any means of escape from an old, crumbling terrace with inadequate crush barriers, and a surge caused by gates being thrown open allowing far more people into one pen at one time than should ever have been the case. Modern safe standing areas, as seen in the German Bundesliga are a world away from what we saw here back in the '70s and '80s. Is it now IOSH policy not to support standing areas, even if they are modern safe standing areas?
Victor Meldrew  
#3 Posted : 24 February 2012 18:29:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Victor Meldrew

I concur mylesfrancis - 75% of my work has/is with Sports Stadia and Sports Stadia Events and subsequently I have concerns. I felt at the time that the decision to go to 'all seater' was not really addressing the 'root cause' of Hillsborough and that it was a knee jerk reaction and something that IMHO, took 'people' away from addressing the real cause, hence the search from the group that was formed, e.g. Justice for the 96, in an attempt to get to the truth about those killed at Hillsborough.
firesafety101  
#4 Posted : 25 February 2012 12:47:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I think it is irresponsible people that stand in seated areas of stadiums. Lots of problems caused - potential for tripping over the seat back in front onto other people causing domino effect - the person behind has to stand up despite having paid for the seat - person behind may be small and stand on the seat, damage to the plastic and potential injury etc. etc. etc. Seats are for sitting on, I am not against bringing back standing terraces. The problems at Hillsborough were not caused by standing - there were lots of other issues not least too many supporters allowed in.
Hally  
#5 Posted : 27 February 2012 09:42:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

Standing happens in the Kop at Anfield in most games and especially in European games, and i agree that it can be very unsafe at times. Even as a Liverpool season ticket holder for the last 23 years i would like to have the option of 'safe standing' like the German model. One standing space per seat which can then be used for all seated games (in european competitions). Hillsborough didn't even have a safety certificate for the ground hence it should never have been used for any games never mind a major semi final where complete breakdown of any communications between the police in the control room and those struggling to control crowds turning up late due to major traffic problems coming across from Liverpool. Anyway, not going to comment too much as i've read a hell of a lot over the years and involved with a footy website that set up a 'Hillsborough for Dummies' website. In less than two weeks time i will be watching Bayer Leverkusen v Borussia Moenchengladbach. The away end has approx 1000 safe standing seats, but the home end doesn't. What they do have is an area of proper terracing for 1500 people (it can take many more but its restricted) and i'll be in that.
DP  
#6 Posted : 27 February 2012 13:09:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

I went to Wembley yesterday and the only time I sat down was half time and between extra time – nobody sat down at all – you had to stand to watch the game – not one announcement in the ground requesting spectators to sit.
mylesfrancis  
#7 Posted : 29 February 2012 10:40:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

Firesafety101 wrote:
I think it is irresponsible people that stand in seated areas of stadiums. Lots of problems caused - potential for tripping over the seat back in front onto other people causing domino effect - the person behind has to stand up despite having paid for the seat - person behind may be small and stand on the seat, damage to the plastic and potential injury etc. etc. etc.
Well, as a season ticket holder, I must've sat down for all of tens minutes across 23 games last season. Am I irresponsible? Possibly. But this issue does tend to have a certain element of self-policing. The most vociferous and animated fans tend to congregate towards the rear of stands behind the goal and all but the most casual of fans would be aware of this. This is one of the problems with the all seater ground - there is now a perception that grounds are "one size fits all". You should be able to sit in pretty much any part of the ground and be able to park your bum for the full 90mins and not expect to have your view interrupted by someone else who likes to get on their feet at least a bit. Back in the "old days" there was a choice to be had - join the vocal, swaying mob on the terrace behind the goal, or take the more refined terraces or seats along the sides. It seems that because there are now allocated seats this can no longer be the case. I also think raising the issue about the "domino effect" of people falling over seats is a classic H&S over-reaction to a potential risk. How often has this actually happened? In 20-odd years of all-seater stadiums being commonplace, I'm not aware of any and I'd wager that there has been little more than a handful despite millions of people passing through the turnstiles in that period.
Hally  
#8 Posted : 29 February 2012 12:29:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

Seen plenty of people fall backwards or forwards into other rows over the years but also never ever seen a domino effect. I've been to approx 500 games in the last ten years, and something in the region of 300 before that (from 89 to 02) plus many others before that which were randomly during the season (due to age and also the fact we moved away from Merseyside). I reckon i could retire if i'd have hated football...
Phillips20760  
#9 Posted : 29 February 2012 12:33:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

Are these really the responses of 'safety' professionals. There was a horrific 'accident' at Hilsborough and the enquiry highlighted many underlying and root causes that required action. One of these, and by no means the only one, was the risks posed by 1000's of people STANDING. Say what you like but it standing increases the risk, and ultimately the effect, of a similar accident. If you want to go back to the days of hooliganism, racism, public urination, and sexism then that is your choice. But going back to the days of standing? Not for me thanks. I'll accept a reduction in "atmosphere" for the safety of myself and my children that can now, thankfully, attend a football match in safety. After all that is what this forum, and us as safety professionals, should be concerned about.
redken  
#10 Posted : 29 February 2012 13:03:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
redken

Phillips "Are these really the responses of 'safety' professionals." In many cases they are the obeservations of eye-witnesses. Football fans are standing in their thousands now!
Hally  
#11 Posted : 29 February 2012 13:39:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

Phillips, i've seen alot over the years on and off from the 70's onwards. Grounds needed and still need safety certs, which Hillsborough didn't have at the time of the crush, so should never have even had people in the stadium never mind 50,000 people. It is no longer a working class game, turning into an opera crowd at some grounds, fans are being priced out from going because of greed and also due to having to pay a lot more due to seats. Even as a long term LFC season ticket holder, i and plenty of others (safety professional or not) wish to have areas within the ground using the german model that has worked. I'm also an eyewitness. I've seen plenty of 'safe seats' used as missiles against Police and other fans. And do you really think Hooliganism has gone away? Clearly not been to an away match at the likes Of Man Utd, Spurs, Chelsea (i've been to probably over 250 aways home and abroad)etc where you still to this day have to keep your wits about you. Sexism and Racism still happens but not to the amount it did even ten years ago. Public urination has been almost wiped out due to extra facilities but i've still seen people urinating in sinks and in corners of toilets due to still a major lack of facilities.
Hally  
#12 Posted : 29 February 2012 13:46:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

Said as much as i'm going to on the subject otherwise i'll be giving the moderators too much work to do, so will leave the thread and won't return to it. If the mods want to delete my previous post, please do as i can fully understand it going and apologies in advance.
HSSnail  
#13 Posted : 29 February 2012 14:18:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

I only recently got a season ticket for my local football team so have never experienced a standing stadium. We only stand when the game get really exciting, which as its Bradford City sadly means about 10 Min's a match these days - anyone at last nights away game may disagree with me. For me the beauty of an all seater stadium is the control over where people actually are. You are allocated a seat number and that's where you sit (more or less). This stops people fighting for what they see as the best vantage point. It must help distribute the crowed around the ground and help the club organise stewards as they know the number of tickets sold in each area. In my youth I went to a number of large concerts and have seen people being rescued from the crush in front of the stage, would hate to see this at a football match in the excitement of a goal being scored. Trust me that does not happen very often at our ground so would be exciting! I cannot say I have ever thought it was dangerous when people do stand for a short while.
mylesfrancis  
#14 Posted : 29 February 2012 14:28:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

Phillips20760 wrote:
Are these really the responses of 'safety' professionals.
Yes it would appear so. Professionals who have looked at the risks proportionately, have been participants in the activity, and have come to a sensible, considered opinion. Your opinion differs, but to effectively question the professionalism of colleagues as a result could also be said to display a certain lack of professionalism.
Quote:
There was a horrific 'accident' at Hilsborough and the enquiry highlighted many underlying and root causes that required action. One of these, and by no means the only one, was the risks posed by 1000's of people STANDING.
Indeed. But the standing issue is the one which was almost gleefully seized upon, particularly by some club owners who recognised the potential revenue implications of such a move. There is absolutely no doubt that things would not have moved so quickly without the complicity of clubs. The fact that standing in large numbers is still allowed and managed at pretty much every other sporting or cultural activity shows what a nonsense this rule is. If standing was the real issue here, why is it still allowed everywhere else?
Quote:
If you want to go back to the days of hooliganism, racism, public urination, and sexism then that is your choice. But going back to the days of standing? Not for me thanks. I'll accept a reduction in "atmosphere" for the safety of myself and my children that can now, thankfully, attend a football match in safety.
I really hope that you're not trying to suggest that those in favour of safe standing areas are also advocates of the other issues you mention. If you are, I find that grossly insulting and undermines any valid opinion you may have had. In my opinion, there has always been the option to attend a football match in safety - and I touched on that in my earlier post. Having been a regular spectator for getting on for 30 years, I have been caught up in trouble on precisely zero occasions. And that's been over a good spread of both all-seater and standing areas. In fact, most of the trouble happens well away from grounds these days, and grounds being all-seater is only a very small part of the reasoning for that (bigger influences are better CCTV in grounds, better intelligence, banning orders, and more). Modern grounds are a vast improvement over the "facilities" fans were provided with in the '70s and '80s, but to imply that the use of modern safe standing areas will result in wholesale return to those dark days is patent nonsense.
mylesfrancis  
#15 Posted : 29 February 2012 14:37:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

By the way, for those who haven't seen modern safe standing facilities, there is a good gallery of the areas in use at FC Hoffenheim (German Premier League) here: http://www.safestandingroadshow.co.uk/gallery-2
Phillips20760  
#16 Posted : 29 February 2012 18:00:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

I'm not saying hooliganism has gone away, and that's one of the many reasons why standing teraces shouldn't be re-introduced! Although it hasn't gone away completely the UK has an excellent safety record at modern grounds, and yet we are casting longing gazes to the German model where hooliganism is actually on the increase! I also wasn't intentionally questioning anyones professionalism merely trying to understand how you can come to a reasoned judgement that 10,000 people equally dispersed, in designated seats is NOT safer than 10,000 standing supporters with freedom to stand where they want....? It seems IOSH agreee with this as per their press release - a view not agreed with by the posters on this thread...?
firesafety101  
#17 Posted : 29 February 2012 19:46:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I'm not saying standing should not be allowed, only that in a seated stadium all should sit. In stadiums where standing areas have been designed and built by all means stand, everyone in those areas will expect that, but please don't stand in a seated area. Would you do that at the theatre, or cinema?
mylesfrancis  
#18 Posted : 01 March 2012 10:15:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

Phillips20760 wrote:
I'm not saying hooliganism has gone away, and that's one of the many reasons why standing teraces shouldn't be re-introduced! Although it hasn't gone away completely the UK has an excellent safety record at modern grounds, and yet we are casting longing gazes to the German model where hooliganism is actually on the increase!
Sorry, but again I have to take issue on this. IMHO, it's lazy to equate hooliganism with standing terraces. The apparent rise in German hooliganism has more to do with the increased levels of disaffection amongst the youth of the former East Germany and the corresponding rise in membership of far-right groups. Again, as in England today, the vast majority of incidents happen well away from stadiums. Also, people aren't making the judgement that standing is "safer" than seated stadia. What they are doing is carrying out a risk assessment (believe it or not!) and coming to the conclusion that whilst, yes, it can be argued that seated stadia are safer, having regard to all the factors they do not feel it necessary to impose all-seater stadia - i.e. to do so would be disproportionate to the level of risk. The point still remains that if standing was the real issue here, steps would have been taken to address this in other sporting and cultural arenas. With regards to Firesafety101's comment about not standing in seated areas and asking "would you do that at the theatre or cinema?", that is a frankly daft question to ask. Theatre and cinema do not have a long-standing (excuse the pun!) tradition of their patrons standing (unless you want to go back to the days of the Globe and Rose theatres!), and haven't suddenly had seats imposed upon them along with a massive hike in the price of attendance. For the record, I'm really not against all-seater stadia per se. What I do take issue with is that huge strides have been taken in stadium design, security, etc etc but this gets dismissed simply on the perception that standing=bad without any real assessment of all the factors involved. As per my original post, I'm actually really disappointed by the approach taken by IOSH on this matter and will be asking for a copy of the survey and results to see what is driving this policy position. And I shall descend from my soapbox now :-)
Corfield35303  
#19 Posted : 01 March 2012 11:02:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Corfield35303

If standing can be done safely, as it is at some European grounds, then people should be given the option. People at sporting/music events arent at work so can (and arguably so) choose to take a 'risk' of standing if they like. Ive ended up standing at many events when I didnt want to simply so I could see. I dont think its always possible to dictate to crowds. If there was a standing area then at least one excuse is removed. Do concerts with standing areas tend to have fewer problems with people standing in the sitting areas? I don't know but if the customer wants to stand, we should try to find ways to let them do that as safely as possible.
HSSnail  
#20 Posted : 01 March 2012 14:33:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Have just looked at the link mylesfrancis provided - very interesting. I can see no reason why standing in this way would be more dangerous thank sitting - probably quite the reverse as the barriers would stop people falling forward. Still looks like people would be assigned a specific spot so my comments about overcrowding etc in certain areas is seating was removed would be redundant.
jfw  
#21 Posted : 21 March 2012 00:22:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jfw

I remember cold winter nights in the late 1970's when 6 or 7 of us would pile into a friends mum's little mini, (5 in the back and 2 in the passenger seat usually ! ), and she would drive us up to the Victoria Ground in Stoke to see the mid week games. We were 8 or 9 years old at the time. We would go into the "Paddocks", which I am surprised nobody has mentioned. For those who don't know what a Paddock is, they are small sections of terracing beside the pitch separated by walls. In the case of the Victoria Ground, the ones we used were in the main stand, below the seating, next to the pitch. Each Paddock was probably 10/12 terrace steps deep and about 15 yards across. I think there were 7 or 8 of them running along the side of the pitch. I remember the first time we went being surprised to see children of the same age in the queue with plastic milk crates, but I soon realised why once inside. This was because the very front of the Paddocks were below pitch level, so they would take the milk crates down to the front and stand on them. As a child, I found the Paddock environment perfectly safe, especially when compared to the large terraces found behind the goals. The boundaries of the Paddock prevented overcrowding and by being pitch side and not too deep, there was less risk of toppling forward. In fact most people would stand towards the back of the Paddock as you got a better view due to the low level of the Paddock. Over the years I have been to many different stadiums at all levels of the game, from non-league to premiership. The modern all seater stadiums, which are well stewarded, are safe environments and I believe that this had resulted in an increase in women and children attending games. The Taylor report has done a great deal of good for the game, in creating these modern stadiums. However, if standing were to be re-introduced, I would like to see something along the lines of the Paddock type of enclosure. Small sections, pitch side and not too deep, which can easily be stewarded, with the majority of the stadium seating. The problem I have with the German system, is that you are allocated a space, so if you get the very tall person in front of you, you are stuck with them. However with a Paddock type of enclosure you can at least move to a position where your view is clear. This post is not part of a campaign to bring back standing areas, but if the authorities were to consider bringing back standing in grounds, I believe they should seriously consider the Paddock type of area.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.