Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
riskybizz  
#1 Posted : 26 April 2012 16:29:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
riskybizz

Afternoon Guys, Having spent the last few months grafting away trying to gain UKATA accreditation to deliver Asbestos Awareness training, the new kid on the block appears to be E-learning! Could anyone explain how the authenticity and identity of the candidate can be established? UKATA have strict criteria to become a training centre, but seem to relax this in the case of E-learning. Having personally had experience of e-learning i appreciate it can be a good medium, However i would disagree with this in the instance of such a serious subject of possible asbestos exposure.
bob youel  
#2 Posted : 27 April 2012 07:59:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

E -learning is the in-thing but U are correct about its effectiveness and other things in my opinion but management like it because its cheap and companies selling to businesses do what their clients want Argue your case [if that is what you are doing] as the authenticity and identity of the candidate cannot be easily established nor can genuine feedback regarding learning as opposed to attending training be determined
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.