Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
9Yally  
#1 Posted : 26 July 2013 10:03:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
9Yally

Morning All, I am writing RA's for solar PV fits at the moment. It is recommended that roof ladders are used when working on roofs (Obviously). However in the solar pv world the rails that are used to fix to the panels run along the roof which doesn't allow the use of the ladders. However what the fitters do is fix the rails and use these to step up on. The rails are solid and do not move and allow access. However I am not sure if I can put this in my Safe working Procedure as access as I do not have the rails, brackets, screws load tested etc ? I also cant use a roof ladder. We always use fixed scaffold for all fits and have banned towers. Any ideas on what to do in this situation as it is a tricky one ? Many Thanks
Ron Hunter  
#2 Posted : 26 July 2013 10:51:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

WAH heirarchy permits a scaffold platform to mitigate the effects of a fall when other measures are impractical. The scaffold has to be at the correct height, fully boarded and railed, and you have to avoid the very common problem of tools and materials and all sorts of nasty sharp things being positioned at the stage area where people are most likely to fall!!
Lisa Boulton  
#3 Posted : 26 July 2013 11:09:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lisa Boulton

http://www.cskills.org/u...allation_tcm17-33755.pdf The CITB have put this guidance note together in conjunction with the HSE about safe working on solar panel installation and commissioning and includes a section on maintenance. What you say in your post I think is common practise as the rails are secured to the joists and used to take the weight of the worker, BUT this method must be used in conjunction with suitable scaffold (collective measures of working at height) as per Ron's comments. Regards Lisa B
Zimmy  
#4 Posted : 26 July 2013 11:17:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

Also be very aware that these panels cannot be turned off. As soon as the covers are removed they generate enough voltage (when in series) to knock you flat (i.e. dead flat!) Wire all tools to the belt. For the most part electricians will be doing this work so should be well up on safety...yes yes...zimmy in the world of dreams again! Dopn;t forget the bit about getting the inverter into the attic space (another real joy for an RA) Z
Zimmy  
#5 Posted : 26 July 2013 11:19:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

Dopn;t is Welsh for Don't
9Yally  
#6 Posted : 26 July 2013 11:59:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
9Yally

Ron - Excellent advice as always - you must be earning a mint with your knowledge ;) Lisa - Thank you for the link, have seen this previously and it is a great document Zimmy - Firstly thank you for teaching me a new welsh word ;), Secondly the inverter in the loft is always an interesting one, I will be tackling that RA next. Will drop you an email message once complete Thanks
Zimmy  
#7 Posted : 26 July 2013 12:33:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

No probs 9's. If I can help with the electrical ra let me know Z
Ron Hunter  
#8 Posted : 26 July 2013 13:08:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

9yally wrote:
Ron - Excellent advice as always - you must be earning a mint with your knowledge ;)
If you mean Polo Mints, then yes I don't do too badly.
paul.skyrme  
#9 Posted : 26 July 2013 22:34:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

IMHO, the inverter should NEVER be in the loft.
Zimmy  
#10 Posted : 27 July 2013 07:14:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

I agree Paul. It's one hell of a crazy place to put any electrical kit but that's where the put the thing. You and I know better Paul. I have said my bit on the con trick that passes itself as 'green' energy on the LinkedIn forums. The pure rubbish that is talked about wind and Photopv makes a good bed time story but falls short in the real world. We, the enlightened (the chosen ones), will not be taken in by the fake industry that has been created, but then ,what di I know? If people are taken in by the trick so be it but that is what is. Think about it folks. IMHO of course. You dear readers may think otherwise. Your money, your call :-)
RayRapp  
#11 Posted : 27 July 2013 08:38:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Some good advice posted, but would like to clarify a few a couple of points. When working on solar panels on a pitched roof, a harness and double lanyard should be worn with a mini karibiner clipped onto at least one of the rails at all times when on the roof. The lanyard should be of a length which allows free movement but will also arrest a fall. It is an awkward method of work that's for sure. As someone else mentioned, a scaffold must be provided at the front, back or both sides of the pitched roof if installing both sides. The scaffold should protect the whole of the work area, but not necessarily the side of the roof, unless access is required. Finally, training should be provided for those fitting solar panels, which should include awareness of the prevailing weather conditions, high winds, icy roofs, etc. Installing solar panels in windy conditions is a precarious task because of the wind loading on the panels.
johnmurray  
#12 Posted : 27 July 2013 15:49:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

I dunno Zim'.... The householder who has them installed (free) gets their electricity free, as long as the batteries last, and the installer/owner gets the difference between the unit cost and the buy-in tariff... Of course, if the system is grid connected and there is a power cut....the solar system also fails.. It is, of course, a scam. It will only last as long as the subsidy is there ! Of course, the ordinary user is paying for the solarPV system and its use................................
ExDeeps  
#13 Posted : 27 July 2013 17:31:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ExDeeps

Apologies, bit of thread creap - why should the inverter not go in the loft? I know what an inverter is, I know how they work, I am not a domestic sparks but a curious ex naval electrical type who works in a power station, Thanks, Jim
paul.skyrme  
#14 Posted : 27 July 2013 18:28:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

ExDeeps wrote:
Apologies, bit of thread creap - why should the inverter not go in the loft? I know what an inverter is, I know how they work, I am not a domestic sparks but a curious ex naval electrical type who works in a power station, Thanks, Jim
Jim, Manual handling issues to get it there in the first place, ditto when it needs replacing. Inadequate access for routine maintenance. Thus does not meet maintainability requirements of CDM, or BS7671 etc. Temperatures, it contains commercial electronics, they don't like elevated temperatures, such as are experienced in domestic lofts. Forget all you ever learned about "hardened" electronics for military use, they don't exist in the commercial world as no one will pay for them. Does not comply with BS7671, which requires compliance with manufacturers instructions, which will almost certainly say that they must not be used in teperatures in excess of x deg C. Which WILL be exceeded in a domestic loft in the UK. The reason they are sites there are, incompetnt designers, incompetent installers, and price. A domestic loft is not the place for them. (Full stop, BTW!;))
ExDeeps  
#15 Posted : 28 July 2013 08:34:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ExDeeps

Paul, Thanks for that explanation. One more Q if I may; where should/could an inverter go? Just thinking about space in modern, and for that matter older houses these days; Garage? Many don't have one. Under the stairs somewhere? Room. Utility cupboard? Lack of room again Kitchen? Unlikely due to size, loss of storage Jim
boblewis  
#16 Posted : 28 July 2013 08:40:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Perhaps retro fit to domestic roofs is not the right thig to do then. Hey Ho another industry killed off by H&S regulations:-) Bob
boblewis  
#17 Posted : 28 July 2013 08:41:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Oops another welsh word - Thig is Thing in english>:-) Bob
Chris G  
#18 Posted : 29 July 2013 12:50:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Chris G

The inverter for my PV went in my utility room. At about 18 inch x 18 inch x 6 inch it's not that bulky. Installers of the system were (according to the wife - I was at work) a pair of monkeys, 1 ladder, walking on the mounting bars no edge or fall protection. Also according to the company - all workers are in house we don't use contractors - proved bull as I met them at the end of the job & they were contractors from another company. They told me (before they knew what my job is) that they didn't need a risk assessment as the work was on a domestic property not a workplace. I have since had discussions with the PV company! Chris G
Gary Newton  
#19 Posted : 29 July 2013 13:55:02(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Gary Newton

I have written my companies R/A's for PV's and can confirm that the advice Rayrapp has given is the one you should follow. Scaffold and lanyards..
paul.skyrme  
#20 Posted : 29 July 2013 18:15:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

Not an industry killed off by H&S, more an industry dominated by muppet designers & installers, and those who are not having conditions forced on them that are unacceptable. The loft is not the place, if you check the inverter install instructions, I bet that the loft space would be excluded, so that is not a H&S issue what so ever. Personally, I would be unhappy having one in my loft & it is floored, with permenant lighting, and an almost full standard size access door! The best location is somewhere cold & dry, with the minimum of condensation, there it will experience the most efficient function and longest life of its components.
Zimmy  
#21 Posted : 29 July 2013 19:19:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

Ray and Paul have said it all. And of course you will be working with Live wiring.
SNS  
#22 Posted : 29 July 2013 22:18:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SNS

Hi all, Since the inverter is now installed in the loft, should I put a smoke / rate of rise detector in there? Finances of my installation are that from year 7 I get 'free' electricity at todays prices until the set up runs out.
paul.skyrme  
#23 Posted : 29 July 2013 22:23:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

sns wrote:
Hi all, Since the inverter is now installed in the loft, should I put a smoke / rate of rise detector in there? Finances of my installation are that from year 7 I get 'free' electricity at todays prices until the set up runs out.
Personally, I would be getting your installer to "prove" that it complies with the inverter manufacturers instructions... Along with the requirements of BS7671 & the requirements of REAL. TBH, and knowing nothing more than I have read in your post, I seriously doubt it actually does, thus someone is or has committed fraud...
gramsay  
#24 Posted : 26 June 2014 13:14:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
gramsay

Apologies for digging up an ancient thread, but this was the closest thing I could find when I was searching. I've been asked about this method of access for installing PV panels (the option which includes a hoist for the panel): http://www.solarresource...arscaffoldingcompany.htm Watching the videos there are a number of issues which concern me, but I've never seen these things in the flesh. If anyone has an opinion I'd be grateful to hear it. Thanks
tony.  
#25 Posted : 26 June 2014 19:25:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
tony.

My pv install 5 years ago House 1-1/2 storey victorian property Full scaffold to start of roof. Inverter mounted on brick wall on roof One roof elevation of roof covered with pv now reducing loft temperature. Never had a minutes problem. Fully certified by installer and paperwork accepted into the FIT scheme
paul.skyrme  
#26 Posted : 26 June 2014 20:51:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

tony. wrote:
... Never had a minutes problem. ...
In the same way that the rest of your electrical installation will not kill you, until there is a particular set of circumstances if it has no earth. Not having a minutes problem is not indicative of a suitable, compliant and sufficient install that will last its design life. TBH, IF your install is 100% compliant then I will be absolutely AMAZED, 90+% of the solar installs I have seen, heard of, seen pictures of, come across were not compliant in one way or another. IF your inverter is in the loft, then that is a non-compliance to begin with. Try CDM for a starter for that one.
tony.  
#27 Posted : 26 June 2014 21:20:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
tony.

Paul, You do not know the inverter make model or technical specification. You do not know that i have a proper staircase, floored loft with adequete room for equipment and suitable maintenance room, with plentry of light and ventillation. I will immediately switch it off Just as i sign off on this thread for good too
paul.skyrme  
#28 Posted : 27 June 2014 22:54:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

tony. You are making a habit of stating that I am wrong, then stating that you will no longer post on the thread. I suspect that it is because you fear being ridiculed. I stand by my comments even though what you state is correct, in that I don't know the spec of your inverter. I don't need to. IF it is in the loft then it will almost certainly fit into the 90%. IF you can prove otherwise then fine, however, I seriously doubt you can. You are just one of these trolls who makes statements and then refuses to back them up with any evidence or is willing to justify, explain or expand them. That is not conducive on a professional forum.
RayRapp  
#29 Posted : 28 June 2014 12:33:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Back to the question posted by Gramsay. I have never seen this method before, that does not mean it's not any good, but like you I have some queries. First, the whole process of setting up the equipment looks a bit...er, clumsy. Normally the pitched roof would need accessing as described in my previous post on the original thread, I presume the ladder system is replacing a bespoke tube scaffold? If so, that makes me feel uncomfortable. For a definitive answer I think you would need to see the whole operation of fitting solar panels in the flesh. Too many if and buts for my liking.
gramsay  
#30 Posted : 30 June 2014 11:21:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
gramsay

Thanks, Ray.
allanwood  
#31 Posted : 30 June 2014 12:26:05(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
allanwood

i discussed the location of the inverter with my installer when i had my solar PV system fitted last year, and he was quite happy to place it in the loft mounted onto the gable wall. we discussed various locating options such as the internal garage but he was quite happy for it to be placed in the loft, and to be quite honest the loft is cooler than the garage anyway. the installers safely managed to lift the inverter into the loft which by the way is fully boarded out and installed it without issue.
Ron Hunter  
#32 Posted : 01 July 2014 15:24:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

paul.skyrme wrote:
Manual handling issues to get it there in the first place, ditto when it needs replacing. Inadequate access for routine maintenance. Thus does not meet maintainability requirements of CDM
Further thread creep! The problems you describe have long been a problem with domestic gas boilers situated in cupboards, above kitchen worktops etc. I was struck by the similarity only, and not doubting your view on inverter placement for a moment.
paul.skyrme  
#33 Posted : 01 July 2014 17:45:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

allanwood wrote:
i discussed the location of the inverter with my installer when i had my solar PV system fitted last year, and he was quite happy to place it in the loft mounted onto the gable wall. we discussed various locating options such as the internal garage but he was quite happy for it to be placed in the loft, and to be quite honest the loft is cooler than the garage anyway. the installers safely managed to lift the inverter into the loft which by the way is fully boarded out and installed it without issue.
As I have already said, did the installer actually have a clue? In my experience, the majority I have come across don't have a sufficient understanding of BS7671, the solar requirements of REAL, and the other relevant H&S legislation. Did they install an EM light at the point where the inverter is, or is there sufficient natural daylight in the loft?
paul.skyrme  
#34 Posted : 01 July 2014 17:47:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

Ron Hunter wrote:
paul.skyrme wrote:
Manual handling issues to get it there in the first place, ditto when it needs replacing. Inadequate access for routine maintenance. Thus does not meet maintainability requirements of CDM
Further thread creep! The problems you describe have long been a problem with domestic gas boilers situated in cupboards, above kitchen worktops etc. I was struck by the similarity only, and not doubting your view on inverter placement for a moment.
Ron, I agree completely. Mind I am considering putting my gas boiler in the loft, however, not sure if it will be feasible. I'll have to get it there myself, and if I can't do that, then I can't expect anyone else to do it for me. There is definitely a MH issue with many boiler locations I have seen.
allanwood  
#35 Posted : 01 July 2014 18:24:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
allanwood

Paul The installer holds all the necessary certifications and accreditations. He even inspected the scaffold himself and wouldn't let his installers use it until some alterations where made. He also stopped the installation due to adverse weather delaying the job. I have lighting already installed in the loft as well as it being boarded out. It sounds like you are generalising and tarring every solar PV-R installer with the same brush. I for one certainly don't allow sub standard works to be undertaken on my home. Allan
paul.skyrme  
#36 Posted : 01 July 2014 19:11:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

allanwood wrote:
Paul The installer holds all the necessary certifications and accreditations. He even inspected the scaffold himself and wouldn't let his installers use it until some alterations where made. He also stopped the installation due to adverse weather delaying the job. I have lighting already installed in the loft as well as it being boarded out. It sounds like you are generalising and tarring every solar PV-R installer with the same brush. I for one certainly don't allow sub standard works to be undertaken on my home. Allan
OK the "installer" did, all of them? There is lighting and boarding in the loft, in the event of a mains failure and there is a requirement to work on the inverter, then I trust that you have ensured that the requirements for "emergency" lighting have been met so that those employed to do the work are safe to do so with adequate lighting. Yes I am generalising, in the same way that many groups are tarred with being part of the lowest common denominator, it is demeaning, possibly, but, it happens, and, it will continue to happen the H&S profession does it all the time, as it does not distinguish between trades, competencies and tasks very often when dictating what PPE will be worn to do works. All I can say is that following the lines that I have experienced there majority of installs done do not fully comply. I had participants in a class where I was teaching the BS7671 17th edition course. They were "solar" installers, when a glaring issue was highlighted between the practices that they undertook, and what was acceptable under BS7671 as a life saving measure, they could not comprehend the problem for several hours. Once the "penny" dropped, there was an "Oh Heck" moment from them a few hours later. I would never accuse you of knowingly allowing sub-standard works to be undertaken on your home, but, if you are competent to do the works, why the heck employ someone to do them? It would be cheaper to do them yourself? Taking the solar pv issue, are you totally familiar with all of the requirements of BS7671? What about the associated guidance, and the REAL scheme requirements. You see there is a latent issue with Solar PV that the "powers that be" in the "industry" have not addressed. I have asked the question, and I have not had a satisfactory or definitive answer, so I have had to formulate my own from the first principles of engineering as I have been taught all of my working life, through my trade training, my degrees and my cpd. If you have a TT install final circuits must disconnect within 0.2s, if you have a TN install this is 0.4s. A solar inverter only has to stop generating in 5s after mains failure. So, IF you hammer a nail into a circuit and are suffering an electric shock, the "DNO mains" must disconnect within 0.2s (TT) or 0.4s (TN) systems. This would normally be achieved in a TT system by the use of an RCD. Now IF your solar system feeds in down stream of the rcd for the circuit from which you are suffering a shock, it, only has to shut down 5s later. So this could give you a prolonged shock for up to 4.8s, now I personally would not like to be hanging off 230V a.c. for 4.8 s, noting that there is no rcd to protect you from this current, it would probably kill you. This is a glaring loop hole in the requirements, and none of the "industry bodies" have given me an answer to this issue. It is probable that the inverter would disconnect in less than 5s, however the product standard only requires a 5s disconnection. Now, IF your solar install is 100% compliant the inverter feed MUST be upstream of any and all final circuit protective devices. Are you sure it is? Would you stake your life on it, as if you did some careless DIY you might have to. However, I am now telling you something that you were already 100% aware of all of the details of including which regulations are contended, as you "certainly don't allow sub standard works to be undertaken on my home". So, you also had all of the paperwork for the install, all of the test result paperwork, the guarantees, all of the module serial numbers etc.? Please remember, it was an "NICEIC Approved Contractor" that killed Emma Shaw as decided by the coroner. Would you like to come back with more information so that you can be sure that your install complies?
allanwood  
#37 Posted : 01 July 2014 22:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
allanwood

Paul You seem to be on a bit of a mission here! If you have discvered a problem with the way solar PV system are installed you should raise this with the relevant trade bodies. I do have all the paperwork ,guarantees and serial numbers provided from the contractor. By the way I spoke to several companies prior to choosing the installation contractor. And as stated earlier he holds all the appropriate certification and accreditations so how else can assess their competence? as for emergency lighting im pretty sure that this can be easily overcome by means of a head mounted lamp. the thread initially related to the positioning of the inverter and all I was doing was sharing my experiences and the fact that I have been totally satisfied by the service provided.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.