Rank: Super forum user
|
allanwood wrote:Paul
The installer holds all the necessary certifications and accreditations.
He even inspected the scaffold himself and wouldn't let his installers use it until some alterations where made.
He also stopped the installation due to adverse weather delaying the job.
I have lighting already installed in the loft as well as it being boarded out.
It sounds like you are generalising and tarring every solar PV-R installer with the same brush.
I for one certainly don't allow sub standard works to be undertaken on my home.
Allan
OK the "installer" did, all of them?
There is lighting and boarding in the loft, in the event of a mains failure and there is a requirement to work on the inverter, then I trust that you have ensured that the requirements for "emergency" lighting have been met so that those employed to do the work are safe to do so with adequate lighting.
Yes I am generalising, in the same way that many groups are tarred with being part of the lowest common denominator, it is demeaning, possibly, but, it happens, and, it will continue to happen the H&S profession does it all the time, as it does not distinguish between trades, competencies and tasks very often when dictating what PPE will be worn to do works.
All I can say is that following the lines that I have experienced there majority of installs done do not fully comply.
I had participants in a class where I was teaching the BS7671 17th edition course.
They were "solar" installers, when a glaring issue was highlighted between the practices that they undertook, and what was acceptable under BS7671 as a life saving measure, they could not comprehend the problem for several hours.
Once the "penny" dropped, there was an "Oh Heck" moment from them a few hours later.
I would never accuse you of knowingly allowing sub-standard works to be undertaken on your home, but, if you are competent to do the works, why the heck employ someone to do them?
It would be cheaper to do them yourself?
Taking the solar pv issue, are you totally familiar with all of the requirements of BS7671?
What about the associated guidance, and the REAL scheme requirements.
You see there is a latent issue with Solar PV that the "powers that be" in the "industry" have not addressed.
I have asked the question, and I have not had a satisfactory or definitive answer, so I have had to formulate my own from the first principles of engineering as I have been taught all of my working life, through my trade training, my degrees and my cpd.
If you have a TT install final circuits must disconnect within 0.2s, if you have a TN install this is 0.4s.
A solar inverter only has to stop generating in 5s after mains failure.
So, IF you hammer a nail into a circuit and are suffering an electric shock, the "DNO mains" must disconnect within 0.2s (TT) or 0.4s (TN) systems.
This would normally be achieved in a TT system by the use of an RCD.
Now IF your solar system feeds in down stream of the rcd for the circuit from which you are suffering a shock, it, only has to shut down 5s later.
So this could give you a prolonged shock for up to 4.8s, now I personally would not like to be hanging off 230V a.c. for 4.8 s, noting that there is no rcd to protect you from this current, it would probably kill you.
This is a glaring loop hole in the requirements, and none of the "industry bodies" have given me an answer to this issue.
It is probable that the inverter would disconnect in less than 5s, however the product standard only requires a 5s disconnection.
Now, IF your solar install is 100% compliant the inverter feed MUST be upstream of any and all final circuit protective devices.
Are you sure it is?
Would you stake your life on it, as if you did some careless DIY you might have to.
However, I am now telling you something that you were already 100% aware of all of the details of including which regulations are contended, as you "certainly don't allow sub standard works to be undertaken on my home".
So, you also had all of the paperwork for the install, all of the test result paperwork, the guarantees, all of the module serial numbers etc.?
Please remember, it was an "NICEIC Approved Contractor" that killed Emma Shaw as decided by the coroner.
Would you like to come back with more information so that you can be sure that your install complies?
|