Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Julieriggs74  
#1 Posted : 10 August 2013 13:39:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Julieriggs74

I am writing an article about the history of woman within the OHS profession, commencing with the first appointment of ‘Lady Inspectors’ in 1893 through to the appointment of Judith Hackitt I am very interested to hear the views of IOSH members regarding gender within OHS, has gender had any influence on the direction and shape of our profession? Is gender important in representing our communities? Do we attract enough female talent into the industry? Testimonies of female practitioners would be welcomed.... thanks Julie Riggs
Kate  
#2 Posted : 10 August 2013 20:19:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

I'd be interested to read the article. In my personal anecdotal experience, old school (male) safety 'officers' had interpersonal skills of virtually nil. I suspect this was the very reason they ended up being shoved into the job as they weren't wanted anywhere else. Their approach was to go round saying 'stop that'. With the recent professionalisation of H&S, there is now an increased recognition of the need for soft skills which women are traditionally assumed to have more of. For example, soft skills are represented in the skills to be demonstrated for IPD and job interviewers focus on soft skills. So a kind of feminisation goes along with professionalisation. On the other hand, I was recently criticised for a soft approach and was asked to be 'more right-wing'!
John M  
#3 Posted : 10 August 2013 21:42:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John M

Quote In my personal anecdotal experience, old school (male) safety 'officers' had interpersonal skills of virtually nil. I suspect this was the very reason they ended up being shoved into the job as they weren't wanted anywhere else. Their approach was to go round saying 'stop that'. With the recent professionalisation of H&S, there is now an increased recognition of the need for soft skills which women are traditionally assumed to have more of. For example, soft skills are represented in the skills to be demonstrated for IPD and job interviewers focus on soft skills. So a kind of feminisation goes along with professionalisation. A sexist non sensible response. Please review the history of Factory Inspectors, Managers of Mines and the birth of IOSH. Jon
Kate  
#4 Posted : 11 August 2013 08:27:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

There's no need to be rude. As I took care to say, I was reporting my "personal, anecdotal experience" and not attempting to give a historical perspective.
John M  
#5 Posted : 11 August 2013 08:51:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John M

No intention or desire to be rude Madam; however your remarks must be regarded as highly sexist. Should male posters indicate that they have more skills than female ("soft" or otherwise) I'm sure the sisterhood would have something to say. Jon
Kate  
#6 Posted : 11 August 2013 10:41:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

I object to being addressed as "Madam" and I suggest that you read the words I wrote and not the words you imagine I wrote.
Julieriggs74  
#7 Posted : 11 August 2013 17:32:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Julieriggs74

For those who would like to contact me direct.. julieriggs@btinternet.com
Victor Meldrew  
#8 Posted : 11 August 2013 17:54:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Victor Meldrew

From the moment I saw the heading to this topic I knew it had got disaster written all over it :-)
walker  
#9 Posted : 12 August 2013 09:06:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

quote=Kate]I'd be interested to read the article. In my personal anecdotal experience, old school (male) safety 'officers' had interpersonal skills of virtually nil. I suspect this was the very reason they ended up being shoved into the job as they weren't wanted anywhere else. Their approach was to go round saying 'stop that'. With the recent professionalisation of H&S, there is now an increased recognition of the need for soft skills which women are traditionally assumed to have more of. For example, soft skills are represented in the skills to be demonstrated for IPD and job interviewers focus on soft skills. So a kind of feminisation goes along with professionalisation. On the other hand, I was recently criticised for a soft approach and was asked to be 'more right-wing'!
Spot on Kate I think its taken a good 25 years to remove these dinosaurs and the perception they created for the rest of us. Julie sounds a very interesting subject look forward to reading it - please let us know when its published.
teh_boy  
#10 Posted : 12 August 2013 09:28:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

Walker wrote:
Spot on Kate I think its taken a good 25 years to remove these dinosaurs and the perception they created for the rest of us.
Have they all gone? :)
Victor Meldrew  
#11 Posted : 12 August 2013 11:07:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Victor Meldrew

teh_boy wrote:
Walker wrote:
Spot on Kate I think its taken a good 25 years to remove these dinosaurs and the perception they created for the rest of us.
Have they all gone? :)
No not yet chap ;-)
Melrose80086  
#12 Posted : 12 August 2013 11:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Melrose80086

As another female in the profession (and previously as a consultant ergonomist), have to agree with Kate as come across a couple of "dinosaurs" in my time both in H&S and on the shop floor - with some being downright patronising. Having said that, I've also had some really good banter with guys on the shop floor / fire service / nuclear industry who have commented on the fact that it was "easier to chat to a pretty lady rather than some "boring old git" [their words not mine I hasten to add before I get acused of anything!]. At my last interview {for the job I now hold}, one of the questions given to my two referees was how would I cope with confrontation. My boss at the time said that "if she can deal with 30 odd hairy firefighters in a training scenario and get them to do what she wanted, she'd have no problem whatsoever with their management teams!" [again, not my words!]. I do think that you have to have a thick skin whether male or female when battling the perception out there that we're all clipboarding wielding carriers of doom and I've worked hard to ensure our staff know I'm there for any question they might have (however stupid they might think the question is) and that, even if I don't know the answer, I will try and find out for them ASAP.
David Bannister  
#13 Posted : 12 August 2013 11:54:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

In nearly 40 years or work I have only once experienced any situation where my gender was an issue. As a very young insurance surveyor I once lost my trousers in the ladies toilet of a footwear factory to a gang of very frisky women after they gave me false directions. I was just giving in to the inevitable when I was sadly rescued by a manager! That was in a tough Lancashire mill town. Had the genders been reversed I believe that more serious consequences would have ensued and had I decided to pursue any grievance I don't think I would have been taken very seriously.
hilary  
#14 Posted : 12 August 2013 12:31:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
hilary

I think that the profession, like a lot of professions, has undergone quite a substantial change with regard to women in recent years. When I started in health and safety in an engineering/manufacturing environment 20 years ago I was very patronised by reps selling products such as machine guarding where they would come in and tell me where the guards went "by law" until I pointed out that actually we had to complete a risk assessment first and ascertain that for ourselves! On a notable occasion we called a company in to demonstrate electrostatic spraying and the sprayer/representative told me to go and get him a coffee!!!! He went home thirsty and without an order! As for the softer skills - I get a load of my "softer skills" stuff from my husband who studied 5 years of psychology towards his doctorate - I use his stuff primarily for behavioural safety and it normally makes for a fun and informative session. These days I think there are so many capable women in our profession that it is accepted as the norm rather than an exception and that is progress. Obviously there are still some dinosaurs around but thankfully, they are dying out and becoming extinct.
peter gotch  
#15 Posted : 12 August 2013 13:02:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

1998 - recruiting to expand our team from 2 to 3. After 2nd interviews, persuaded Chief Exec that we should make two appointments, a MIOSH and a brand new Graduate. Principal Engineer "Have you found someone yet? "Yes." "What's his name?" "Her name is Fiona, and her name is Katherine." "But they'll have to go on construction sites." "Yes". At about this time, the company thought it was doing quite well with 6% of our professional and technical staff women. We were apparently about twice as much an equal opportunities employer than the average consultancy!
walker  
#16 Posted : 12 August 2013 13:29:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

David Bannister wrote:
In nearly 40 years or work I have only once experienced any situation where my gender was an issue. As a very young insurance surveyor I once lost my trousers in the ladies toilet of a footwear factory to a gang of very frisky women after they gave me false directions. I was just giving in to the inevitable when I was sadly rescued by a manager! That was in a tough Lancashire mill town. Had the genders been reversed I believe that more serious consequences would have ensued and had I decided to pursue any grievance I don't think I would have been taken very seriously.
As an new engineering apprentice I was sent to the stores (run by 2 women) for some greased balls.
Nicola Kemmery  
#17 Posted : 12 August 2013 20:20:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nicola Kemmery

I do think there are many more women in H&S now. I started out around 20 years ago and can remember attending a fire safety seminar with around 50 middle aged men and me in my early 20's. Now I go to events and there are many more women in the room. I think there is room for all types - as long as you have the passion and the ability to listen and work with others!
Zimmy  
#18 Posted : 12 August 2013 20:32:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

I knew it! As soon as you winkle women out of the kitchen/bedroon they get ideas way beyond their station!!!! As a man I think women are at least as good as men (in any job) but when it comes to dealing with people us chaps could learn a lot from these strange creatures ;-) Would I call our Kate, Hills or Nicola 'madam? Jeez no!
Nicola Kemmery  
#19 Posted : 12 August 2013 20:54:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nicola Kemmery

I think that's a compliment - I am taking it that way anyway!
hilary  
#20 Posted : 12 August 2013 22:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
hilary

Knowing Zimmy you can take it as a compliment - you'd know soon enough if it wasn't one!!!
RayRapp  
#21 Posted : 13 August 2013 09:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Victor Meldrew wrote:
From the moment I saw the heading to this topic I knew it had got disaster written all over it :-)
Victor, me too! Only checked out the thread to see how many grenades have been thrown in.
Zimmy  
#22 Posted : 13 August 2013 18:49:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

I wish I had half the skills' Hills' and you guys/girls have. All I got is a loud mouth. My respects to you Nicola
malcarleton  
#23 Posted : 13 August 2013 19:31:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
malcarleton

This post was a genuine and interesting response to current politics within the safety profession, it got the full spectrum of replies from old and new forum users, which makes it interesting as opposed to some of the the more mundane "Can I have a copy of" posts. I think that the female professionals within our area of expertise (If I can be so bold) have made a massive and beneficial impact. You only have to read HSE inspectors reports on investigations to come to the conclusion that there are a high percentage of female HSE Inspectors out there doing a power of work. Good on them I say, and the same to female safety engineers, managers, advisors, coordinators. Safety needs a balanced perspective.
John M  
#24 Posted : 13 August 2013 20:54:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John M

Is there not a case to argue or state "that I suspect this was the very reason they ended up being shoved into the job as they weren't wanted anywhere else" as per post #2. Jon
John M  
#25 Posted : 13 August 2013 20:57:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John M

malcarleton wrote:
This post was a genuine and interesting response to current politics within the safety profession, it got the full spectrum of replies from old and new forum users, which makes it interesting as opposed to some of the the more mundane "Can I have a copy of" posts. I think that the female professionals within our area of expertise (If I can be so bold) have made a massive and beneficial impact. You only have to read HSE inspectors reports on investigations to come to the conclusion that there are a high percentage of female HSE Inspectors out there doing a power of work. Good on them I say, and the same to female safety engineers, managers, advisors, coordinators. Safety needs a balanced perspective.
Likewise there are very many male inspectors, engineers, managers advisors etc doing an equally fine job. It is not gender or "soft skills" specific. Jon
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#26 Posted : 13 August 2013 21:26:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Can I point out that Judith Hackett is not male
RayRapp  
#27 Posted : 13 August 2013 22:32:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

ian.blenkharn wrote:
Can I point out that Judith Hackett is not male
Sherlock Holmes I presume?
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#28 Posted : 14 August 2013 08:06:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Oh yes, ole' Sherlock can still recognise a sarcastic dinosaur
walker  
#29 Posted : 14 August 2013 08:06:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

malcarleton wrote:
This post was a genuine and interesting response to current politics within the safety profession, it got the full spectrum of replies from old and new forum users, which makes it interesting as opposed to some of the the more mundane "Can I have a copy of" posts. I think that the female professionals within our area of expertise (If I can be so bold) have made a massive and beneficial impact. You only have to read HSE inspectors reports on investigations to come to the conclusion that there are a high percentage of female HSE Inspectors out there doing a power of work. Good on them I say, and the same to female safety engineers, managers, advisors, coordinators. Safety needs a balanced perspective.
This is all true, but the world of safety is not alone in this. I work in a highly complex engineering environment and we have some excellent women engineers who use their brains rather than their egos. By the way the H&S person at the very top of our organisation is now a woman and she is the best person in that role ( by a long way!) we have had in the time I've been here.
walker  
#30 Posted : 14 August 2013 08:10:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

John M wrote:
Is there not a case to argue or state "that I suspect this was the very reason they ended up being shoved into the job as they weren't wanted anywhere else" as per post #2. Jon
20-30 years ago this WAS the case in the vast majority of workplaces
teh_boy  
#31 Posted : 14 August 2013 14:34:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

malcarleton wrote:
Good on them I say, and the same to female safety engineers, managers, advisors, coordinators. Safety needs a balanced perspective.
Now the thing I find odd is I never thought to wish 'them' luck as I have never event thought about the issue for a second... Now on reflection I'm tending to side with Zimmy :) I started my safety career with a female boss - never even for a second thought it unusual... isn't this the trouble by trying to create equality we are in fact discriminating? This post has been much more interesting than I thought - I'm a little disappointed come one people lets throw some more grenades :)
malcarleton  
#32 Posted : 14 August 2013 17:30:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
malcarleton

John M wrote: Is there not a case to argue or state "that I suspect this was the very reason they ended up being shoved into the job as they weren't wanted anywhere else" as per post #2. I must be a glutton for punishment, I volunteered for my current position as safety engineer after 30 years as an aerospace tech. During my years "On Tools" I witnessed a couple of bad accidents that would have been completely avoidable if only we had the luxury of a dedicated safety team, I'm talking about the dark days when the Forces enjoyed Crown Immunity (No more, thank heavens) So when the opportunity to put the spanners away and head up a brand new safety team presented itself in 2007, I jumped at the chance and we have had measured success in year on year reductions in incidents and near misses.
Victor Meldrew  
#33 Posted : 14 August 2013 22:26:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Victor Meldrew

teh_boy wrote:
This post has been much more interesting than I thought - I'm a little disappointed come one people lets throw some more grenades :)
Ok here goes - ever since the early '80s when as an employee, I & the company that employed me had regular contact, not for bad reasons I hasten to add, with the HSE and subsequently their Inspectors. I was surprised that over the next 25 or so years that all bar two of the Inspectors were women. I mentioned this point to a Senior HSE Officer at an external gathering, to which he responded that it was due to the fact that the salary was poor, men couldn't bring a family up on that pay and that out of the office was the best place for them. OMG.... How things have changed eh? Personally I found everyone of the ladies very fair, firm & professional, which was more than could be said for HIS comment. Thank goodness for the Equality Act.
Dr Sanyi Gabe  
#34 Posted : 15 August 2013 08:03:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Dr Sanyi Gabe

This is not just about the Equity Act. I participated in a research project for the South African Mining Health and Safety Council on PPE for Women in Mining and the main focus was not whether women could do the jobs previously conceived for men, but the suitability of OHS conditions including PPE for women in a male-dominated industry; thus adding the a more practical dimension to gender in OHS. Sanyi
John M  
#35 Posted : 15 August 2013 08:27:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John M

Were there any female Managers (or Inspectors) in /of the coal mines? Jon
Graham Bullough  
#36 Posted : 15 August 2013 16:36:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

By coincidence earlier this week while sorting through old documents I came across a few copies of newsletters for HSE inspectors which I'd kept from my time with HSE. As the main purpose of such newsletters was to alert inspectors about new/updated legislation & standards and significant events and developments within HSE, they tended to be rather factual and unexciting to read. Thankfully, they also tended to include a few anonymised anecdotes from inspectors about their experiences. The following one, entitled "Is she or isn't she?" from 1982 might be of interest to followers of this thread: In the masculine world of industry in Northern England one gets used to people expressing surprise when the factory inspector is female. The usual comment is "Ee, we've never 'ad a woman before". Recently a woman inspector encountered an extreme example of this. After arriving at a factory she was escorted by the receptionist into the factory manager's office and announced as "The factory inspector". The following conversation took place: Manager: (in blank amazement ) You're a woman! Inspector: (surprised) Er, yes. Manager: But you can't be a factory inspector. Inspector: Well, I am. (Introduces herself) Manager: No, really, are you a proper inspector? Inspector: Oh yes, I'm the real thing. You can see my warrant if you wish. Manager: But you can't have women factory inspectors! Inspector: Of course you can. There are quite a lot of us about. There have been women factory inspectors since 1893. Manager: 1893? Well, you amaze me! (pauses to think about it) Tell me, er.....how do you....er.......manage? Inspector: (wondering what's coming next) Manage what? Manager: Well, inspecting engineering places like this. I mean women don't know anything about machinery, and they don't like getting dirty and that. The inspector was amazed to find such an attitude in a relatively young manager. She explained to him about graduate recruitment (that surprised him) and the theoretical and practical training of inspectors. The inspector then inspected the factory which comprised a dirty end where men used machinery to shape metal components and a clean end where women sewed fabric. She left, feeling that she'd done something to alter the manager's attitude towards women. However, three weeks later she received a letter from the manager, addressed to her by name. It began "Dear Sir".
peter gotch  
#37 Posted : 16 August 2013 13:29:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Jon Unless things have changed in the last few years women are still prohibited from working underground in UK mines. We've had scenarios where this has been relevant and (in modern times) wholly unnecessary discrimination against e.g. our female geotechnical engineers.
farmsafety  
#38 Posted : 18 August 2013 23:05:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
farmsafety

Julie Are you aware of the HSE's publication: "Women of Courage: 100 Years of Lady Factory Inspectors 1893-1993". Available from Amazon.
John M  
#39 Posted : 19 August 2013 07:38:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John M

peter gotch wrote:
Jon Unless things have changed in the last few years women are still prohibited from working underground in UK mines. We've had scenarios where this has been relevant and (in modern times) wholly unnecessary discrimination against e.g. our female geotechnical engineers.
Peter. You are correct, but I don't hear the sisterhood making too much noise about not being able to go down the pits. Jon
Julieriggs74  
#40 Posted : 19 August 2013 19:38:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Julieriggs74

farmsafety wrote:
Julie Are you aware of the HSE's publication: "Women of Courage: 100 Years of Lady Factory Inspectors 1893-1993". Available from Amazon.
Many thanks Charlie for your post; I do have this book, along with Lady Inspectors, Not Only The Dangerous Trades: Women's Work And Health In Britain 1880-1914 and a biography of May Tennant, accompanied with some historical archive documentation and academic research. They are such fascinating reads and provide an insightful account of the issues faced at the time. Many thanks for your recommendations Charlie, I am always interested to include additional literature. Kindest regards Julie
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.