Rank: Forum user
|
Good afternoon,
We have had our health surveillance audiometric tests recently. One of the engineers was referred for specialist appointment. The results from those tests are saying that he has noise induced hearing loss. The medical notes are saying that this is reportable by RIDDOR. I have looked everywhere and cannot find any documentation to say whether it is or not. I would say that it is not reportable. Would be grateful of any help or guidance.
Many thanks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
See www.hse.gov.uk/riddor for what's reportable and what's not. (This isn't.)
The list of reportable occupational diseases has recently been reduced - it's possible (I'm not sure) that this one was once reportable but now is not (that might explain why the notes say it is).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Does the report specifically state that this is occupationally induced NIHL? If not, then there are many potential causes and my view is that you do not need to report it until and unless you reach the conclusion that his work could have caused this. If it does state 'occupational', then I would want to know on what basis they claim work related NIHL.
I know that this is not my particular field, but in mine I often see 'clinical' diagnoses that state 'occupational' on the assumption, possibly based on the patient's description, that his/her work has caused the health issue. An investigation often then demonstrates that the major if not sole cause was not his workplace but domestic.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I agree with both Kate & (mostly) with Chris. Latest RIDDOR guidance does not include NIHLas a reportable disease.
The health surveillance people are incorrect.
NIHL may or may not be occupational in origin. Mine isn't.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
L108 Appendix 5 also backs up the above statements if you need referrence
Des
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Descartes,
Sorry to be pedantic but where exactly in App 5 does it cover reporting under RIDDOR - or rather not reporting!
Thanks
Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
No need to apologise Phil, I probably was not that clear, but Table 13 & "actions and advice" & "further actions" all detail what actions should be taken upon recept of audiometry results which show high levels of hearing loss. No point in which does it mention anything to do with RIDDOR, as I say, in support of the previous statements being that RIDDOR is not applicable here.
Kind regards
Des
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Des,
Thanks for that - my interpretation had been in line with yours - nothing saying it was RIDDOR reportable hence no need... but I thought I might have missed something!
Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Is this the first round of audiometric testing? If it is then your tester cannot possibly say if this hearing loss was as a result of the work or not. This will only give baseline figures to mark against in future surveillance. There will be quite a few people who will have some degree of loss and it may have nothing to do with their work at all.
Presumably you are doing the audiometric testing because you have already done some measuring of noise in the workplace and can see that there may be a problem??
Either way NIHL is not reportable and it makes me wonder how good your tester really is if they are handing out this kind of advice.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.