Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
fearghalg  
#1 Posted : 03 March 2014 12:13:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
fearghalg

Good afternoon, We have had our health surveillance audiometric tests recently. One of the engineers was referred for specialist appointment. The results from those tests are saying that he has noise induced hearing loss. The medical notes are saying that this is reportable by RIDDOR. I have looked everywhere and cannot find any documentation to say whether it is or not. I would say that it is not reportable. Would be grateful of any help or guidance. Many thanks.
Kate.  
#2 Posted : 03 March 2014 12:18:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Kate.

See www.hse.gov.uk/riddor for what's reportable and what's not. (This isn't.) The list of reportable occupational diseases has recently been reduced - it's possible (I'm not sure) that this one was once reportable but now is not (that might explain why the notes say it is).
chris.packham  
#3 Posted : 03 March 2014 12:28:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Does the report specifically state that this is occupationally induced NIHL? If not, then there are many potential causes and my view is that you do not need to report it until and unless you reach the conclusion that his work could have caused this. If it does state 'occupational', then I would want to know on what basis they claim work related NIHL. I know that this is not my particular field, but in mine I often see 'clinical' diagnoses that state 'occupational' on the assumption, possibly based on the patient's description, that his/her work has caused the health issue. An investigation often then demonstrates that the major if not sole cause was not his workplace but domestic. Chris
David Bannister  
#4 Posted : 03 March 2014 12:34:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

I agree with both Kate & (mostly) with Chris. Latest RIDDOR guidance does not include NIHLas a reportable disease. The health surveillance people are incorrect. NIHL may or may not be occupational in origin. Mine isn't.
descarte8  
#5 Posted : 03 March 2014 15:55:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
descarte8

L108 Appendix 5 also backs up the above statements if you need referrence Des
Phil Grace  
#6 Posted : 03 March 2014 16:13:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Phil Grace

Descartes, Sorry to be pedantic but where exactly in App 5 does it cover reporting under RIDDOR - or rather not reporting! Thanks Phil
descarte8  
#7 Posted : 04 March 2014 10:52:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
descarte8

No need to apologise Phil, I probably was not that clear, but Table 13 & "actions and advice" & "further actions" all detail what actions should be taken upon recept of audiometry results which show high levels of hearing loss. No point in which does it mention anything to do with RIDDOR, as I say, in support of the previous statements being that RIDDOR is not applicable here. Kind regards Des
Phil Grace  
#8 Posted : 04 March 2014 13:09:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Phil Grace

Des, Thanks for that - my interpretation had been in line with yours - nothing saying it was RIDDOR reportable hence no need... but I thought I might have missed something! Phil
lwthesm  
#9 Posted : 05 March 2014 09:53:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
lwthesm

Is this the first round of audiometric testing? If it is then your tester cannot possibly say if this hearing loss was as a result of the work or not. This will only give baseline figures to mark against in future surveillance. There will be quite a few people who will have some degree of loss and it may have nothing to do with their work at all. Presumably you are doing the audiometric testing because you have already done some measuring of noise in the workplace and can see that there may be a problem?? Either way NIHL is not reportable and it makes me wonder how good your tester really is if they are handing out this kind of advice.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.