Rank: New forum user
|
I have read numerous articles online advising against nitrile gloves when working with MEK but nothing substantiated. Does anyone have any experience of which gloves are best and maybe reference to a British Standard?
Many Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You are correct. Nitrile is not suitable as a glove material for use with MEK. The problem is permeation breakthrough. There is virtually no glove that offers better than splash protection against MEK. The best is butyl rubber, but this is only classified as class 5 for permeation breakthrough (i.e. between 4 and 8 hours). However, bear in mind that these data are only as a result of a laboratory test according to EN374-3 and will almost certainly not represent what you will achieve in practice. They are also expensive. I believe that butyl gloves now cost around £15-20 per pair. Furthermore, if you then mix MEK with another chemical you can significantly affect its performance. There is a way to test gloves for performance under actual working conditions.
Without knowing more about how you intend to use the gloves it is not possible to comment in any real detail. If you would like more feel free to PM me with phone number and e-mail address as I have information on the selection and use of gloves that you will find helpful.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
As per Ansell, their Barrier Gloves have a protection index of 6 with a theoretial breakthrough time of more than 480 minutes.
http://industrialcatalogue.ansell.eu/barrier
However, these are 5 layer laminated glove and need to be worn as per instructions
They are also expensive, around £ 10 and single use!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You can use the Ansell website for theoretical glove selection as it lists its own range of gloves after you have selected the chemical.
Obviously, this is for single chemicals and not mixture and the breakthrough times based on a standard test that does not mimic your use!
http://industrialcatalog...emicalagentstid?tid=2074
In have no direct connection with Ansell, but we use some of their range of gloves.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
With regard to performance achieved under actual working use:
Some years ago I conducted a study in conjunction with Sunderland University where we used detection pads underneath protective gloves to determine the real performance, i.e. permeation breakthrough time. The result showed that the time according to EN374-3 bore little resemblance to that achieved in practice and that it was the nature of the task performed whilst wearing the gloves that was the most critical factor.
As an example, a nitrile glove was being used with xylene. Manufacturer's stated permeation breakthrough time according to EN374-3 was 36 minutes. In one task there was no breakthrough for 2 hours, in another permeation breakthrough occurred in just 5 minutes!
Another manufacturer showed that a glove offered >240 minutes for each of toluene and MEK, but only 9 minutes when the two chemicals were mixed 1:1.
Many factors will affect glove performance, such as temperature, flexing, combinations of chemicals, abrasion, mixtures, etc. Identifying what can be achieved in practice is often extremely difficult.
I have recommended the Ansell Barrier to several clients, but always with the condition that they are worn underneath a nitrile/rubber glove as the Barrier is fragile and easily damaged. It also offers poor dexterity unless underneath another glove. As stated, they are expensive.
Chris
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.