Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
llsedwards  
#1 Posted : 29 July 2015 09:57:22(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
llsedwards

I have read numerous articles online advising against nitrile gloves when working with MEK but nothing substantiated. Does anyone have any experience of which gloves are best and maybe reference to a British Standard? Many Thanks
chris.packham  
#2 Posted : 29 July 2015 10:24:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

You are correct. Nitrile is not suitable as a glove material for use with MEK. The problem is permeation breakthrough. There is virtually no glove that offers better than splash protection against MEK. The best is butyl rubber, but this is only classified as class 5 for permeation breakthrough (i.e. between 4 and 8 hours). However, bear in mind that these data are only as a result of a laboratory test according to EN374-3 and will almost certainly not represent what you will achieve in practice. They are also expensive. I believe that butyl gloves now cost around £15-20 per pair. Furthermore, if you then mix MEK with another chemical you can significantly affect its performance. There is a way to test gloves for performance under actual working conditions. Without knowing more about how you intend to use the gloves it is not possible to comment in any real detail. If you would like more feel free to PM me with phone number and e-mail address as I have information on the selection and use of gloves that you will find helpful. Chris
jay  
#3 Posted : 29 July 2015 12:10:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

As per Ansell, their Barrier Gloves have a protection index of 6 with a theoretial breakthrough time of more than 480 minutes. http://industrialcatalogue.ansell.eu/barrier However, these are 5 layer laminated glove and need to be worn as per instructions They are also expensive, around £ 10 and single use!
jay  
#4 Posted : 29 July 2015 12:14:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

You can use the Ansell website for theoretical glove selection as it lists its own range of gloves after you have selected the chemical. Obviously, this is for single chemicals and not mixture and the breakthrough times based on a standard test that does not mimic your use! http://industrialcatalog...emicalagentstid?tid=2074 In have no direct connection with Ansell, but we use some of their range of gloves.
chris.packham  
#5 Posted : 29 July 2015 13:55:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

With regard to performance achieved under actual working use: Some years ago I conducted a study in conjunction with Sunderland University where we used detection pads underneath protective gloves to determine the real performance, i.e. permeation breakthrough time. The result showed that the time according to EN374-3 bore little resemblance to that achieved in practice and that it was the nature of the task performed whilst wearing the gloves that was the most critical factor. As an example, a nitrile glove was being used with xylene. Manufacturer's stated permeation breakthrough time according to EN374-3 was 36 minutes. In one task there was no breakthrough for 2 hours, in another permeation breakthrough occurred in just 5 minutes! Another manufacturer showed that a glove offered >240 minutes for each of toluene and MEK, but only 9 minutes when the two chemicals were mixed 1:1. Many factors will affect glove performance, such as temperature, flexing, combinations of chemicals, abrasion, mixtures, etc. Identifying what can be achieved in practice is often extremely difficult. I have recommended the Ansell Barrier to several clients, but always with the condition that they are worn underneath a nitrile/rubber glove as the Barrier is fragile and easily damaged. It also offers poor dexterity unless underneath another glove. As stated, they are expensive. Chris
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.