Chris42 wrote:the Legislation does seem to suggest they can have copies :-
Inspection of documents and provision of information
7.—(1) Safety representatives shall for the performance of their functions under section 2(4) of the 1974 Act and under these Regulations, if they have given the employer reasonable notice, be entitled to inspect and take copies of any document relevant to the workplace or to the employees the safety representatives represent which the employer is required to keep
Excepting as in 7(2):
(2) An employer shall make available to safety representatives the information, within the employer’s knowledge, necessary to enable them to fulfil their functions except –
(a) any information the disclosure of which would be against the interests of national security; or
(b) any information which he could not disclose without contravening a prohibition imposed by or under an enactment; or
(c) any information relating specifically to an individual, unless he has consented to its being disclosed; or
(d) any information the disclosure of which would, for reasons other than its effect on health, safety or welfare at work, cause substantial injury to the employer’s undertaking or, where the information was supplied to him by some other person, to the undertaking of that other person; or
(e) any information obtained by the employer for the purpose of bringing, prosecuting or defending any legal proceedings.
(3) Paragraph (2) above does not require an employer to produce or allow inspection of any document or part of a document which is not related to health, safety or welfare.
Other than that, yes, you do have to provide copies...anonymised, or not-anonymised WITH permission of the named individual/s.
Funny how this always descends into "we ain't givin' them nowt"....
Face it, union places are safer, and healthier, than places without. And probably safer than those run by union-resenting managers or H&S amateurs.