Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
syoduntan@yahoo.com  
#1 Posted : 14 April 2016 11:28:14(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
syoduntan@yahoo.com

Hello All, Duration of our site induction for contractors on our site is set at once per year which means contractors need to go through the induction every year. Now some people within the organisation particularly the supervising officers are thinking one year is to short and they are suggesting 2 or 3yrs for re-induction. Please can I have your views on this.
RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 14 April 2016 11:57:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

If the opertive is working on your site on a regular basis why would they need another induction whatever the frequency? The only reason I can think of why an operative might need a re-induction is if they have not worked on the site for a long period and the working environment has changed significantly.
syoduntan@yahoo.com  
#3 Posted : 14 April 2016 12:14:19(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
syoduntan@yahoo.com

Hi RayRapp, Sorry the contractors I meant are not our site permanent operatives, oh yes those will not require re-induction as they will be fully aware of any changes to the building. The contractors am referring to are those that come to work for us on temp basis e.g to repair the roof etc. Some of them could be invited less than 3 times a year, even some once a year.
WatsonD  
#4 Posted : 14 April 2016 12:21:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
WatsonD

I agree. Its always a case of weighing up what is reasonable. A re induction takes people away from productive work, so it needs to be considered necessary.
RayRapp  
#5 Posted : 14 April 2016 12:36:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

syoduntan@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi RayRapp, Sorry the contractors I meant are not our site permanent operatives, oh yes those will not require re-induction as they will be fully aware of any changes to the building. The contractors am referring to are those that come to work for us on temp basis e.g to repair the roof etc. Some of them could be invited less than 3 times a year, even some once a year.
Ahh, I see. In that case then surely the induction frequency should be aligned with how long since they last worked on your site. If more than a year it would not be unreasonable to give an operative a full induction. If it was say 3 months then a full induction may be a bit OTT - maybe a refresher? It also depends on the hazardous nature of the site, task they are doing and whether they are being supervised or not. Not sure a one size fits all approach is the best method.
Polo  
#6 Posted : 14 April 2016 15:23:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Polo

We induct all Contractors on day 1 and then if they come in regularly, we do a refresher every year. If the period between site visits is more than 6 months we re-induct.
Ciaran Delaney  
#7 Posted : 14 April 2016 20:38:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ciaran Delaney

RayRapp wrote:
syoduntan@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi RayRapp, Sorry the contractors I meant are not our site permanent operatives, oh yes those will not require re-induction as they will be fully aware of any changes to the building. The contractors am referring to are those that come to work for us on temp basis e.g to repair the roof etc. Some of them could be invited less than 3 times a year, even some once a year.
Ahh, I see. In that case then surely the induction frequency should be aligned with how long since they last worked on your site. If more than a year it would not be unreasonable to give an operative a full induction. If it was say 3 months then a full induction may be a bit OTT - maybe a refresher? It also depends on the hazardous nature of the site, task they are doing and whether they are being supervised or not. Not sure a one size fits all approach is the best method.
Think this is an excellent answer to the OP query. Nice one, Ray
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.