IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regs 2016 came into force 1st July 2016
Rank: Super forum user
|
It appears that both the HSE and DWP have been silent about The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations 2016 that came into force on 1st July 2016. I wonder how many of us know about this and also, whether it matters or not due to Brexit.
My professional view is that until UK Parliament formally either removes/amends the EU originating regulations, we should not ignore it--not that the implementation of the Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations 2016 will be a priority for the HSE. However, those of us who have OHASA 18001 /Equivalent have to recognise that Regulatory Compliance is a requirement
http://www.legislation.g...i/2016/588/contents/made
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg281.pdf
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It is UK law regardless of recent political events.
The HSE have been low-key about it as they never cared about it in the first place. Their guidance makes clear that they don't think it adds anything substantial to existing legislation and won't make any practical difference.
However I have checked that electromagnetic fields are covered in all our processes (eg hazard prompts) where they could be relevant.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Agree with Kate, hardly a show stopper in the wider context.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Perhaps if a workplace has a bit extra EMF we could blame it on Ghosts ?
Just a thought!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
We have some processes that we will need to show (for the aforementioned 18001 accreditation) that we have risk assessed; we are proposing to use some readily available assessment software (at a cost) that has been created specifically for this we will then be able to make a judgement call as to whether we then go the whole hog and get the actual readings from the equipment where risk is high.
I attended an HSE run event a few years ago and the only risk that I was made aware of from exposure to EMF was the potential for a person to experience 'flashing lights' in their eyes for the duration of their exposure; given that our welding processes have an EMF generating current generally for less than a second we don't see this as an issue. The main concern I think was a secondary problem - eg fall from height as opposed to the 'flashing lights' which incidentally no other members in the conference owned up to ever having an employee claim to have suffered from the 'flashing lights'.
As Kate says the HSE were very lukewarm about the whole thing and have almost IMHO left it to industry to generate the legislation as they were not sure (no real technical experts?) about what to do with the directive - I could have suggested somewhere to put it :-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Why has this been snuck in July? if it's not that important (and I agree it probably isn't), why not wait until the normal six monthly windows of April and October?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Anyone looked at the significance of this regarding Welding
I am advising there isnt any really, but certain folks are demanding i back up my opinions with evidence.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I remember the welding engineer where I previously worked getting excited about this issue. However just checked and the Weld institute info is a few years old now (2013).
http://www.twi-global.co...m-welding-processes-132/
I seem to recall it stalled for quite a while as there was a problem with Hospital scanners (MRI ?) and how were they going to deal with it in that situation.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi Walker; we have some manual welding processes and the link Chris has provided will give you a clue as to how we propose to comply with the Regs. HSE have not yet said definitively if using the software will be enough to comply. We propose to do the assessments and then if any flag up as high risk then we will either measure the EMF or look to move the operator out of the affected zones (which are really quite close to the equipment in our case) some small adjustment of position (?150/200mm) will we think be enough to remove operators from danger zones. Danger zones which may not in real terms pose a significant danger - particularly when compared to some of our other tasks and process.
Not a waste of my time as it is good CPD:-) and no doubt our 18001 auditor will be looking for us to comply.
HTH - please contact me if you want any further info as one of our guys has been quite involved in this as welding/joining is his specialty.
Stu
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
It hasn't been ignored by the HSE. I am on the British Plastics Federation's Industrial H&S Committee and this has been a subject of interest there due to high frequency plastic welding techniques.
Admittedly these machines would not trouble the scorers with regard to the fields generated by those processes, but nevertheless it has been made known to those industries that could be affected,
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Safety Smurf.
Implemented on the deadline for parent Directive. If we had brought the regs in April (the sensible solution) we'd have "gold-plated" the Directive (THAT would never do).
IOSH has gone all Oz today. Security Image - bEAUt
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
EMF Regs? Unbelievable!
Think about it - it's quite subtle!
If you can't make it informative, make it entertaining!
;-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
As opposed to the KLF Regulations, which are both justified, and ancient?
;-)
Onwards to MuMu land.......................
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Or the 'ABC' Regs? Which have a look of love about them?
I'll get my coat.
S
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The REM Regulations will provide a relevant answer to the question "What's the Frequency...."
Thanks to Mr Durrington for that one. No, his name isn't Kenneth.
I look forward to the XTC Regs - anyone?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Apparently there are plans for the XTC regs - Nigel has them?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
ELO regs... Shine a little love (but be careful of the frequencies that you are shining, obviously...)
P.S. What have I started...?!
:-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This is all Madness. It's not even Friday yet.....!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Mr G Numan in the 1980's said 'Are friends electric', which would would possibly be at 50Hz or maybe more for special friends.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
stuie wrote:Apparently there are plans for the XTC regs - Nigel has them?
I wouldn't trust Nigel's plans. He thought there was a future in a British Steel.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Maybe OMD's "Tesla Girls" can sort this out...............
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
AC/DC regs - mmm seems like a touch to much
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
And also on the Highway to Hell with a Whole Lotta Rosie for company.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Perhaps some Led might protect you from this, & ending up on the Stairway to Heaven?... ]:)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Breaking news - HSE propose new Regs to cover Fall Arrest Equipment - there are rumours it will be called the 'UB40 - I got You Babe' Regs.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regs 2016 came into force 1st July 2016
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.