Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
sean  
#1 Posted : 11 July 2012 10:37:38(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Here we go again........ An all user email has been sent to all our staff stating what is allowed and isn't allowed when decorating the office for the upcoming London Olympics, top of the list is:- "Bunting can be hung from the ceiling as long as Blue Tac is used - cello tape should not be used" This email was sent by my immediate manager, I politely asked how the staff were going to reach the ceiling, one of the many comments back was using a ladder? Just when I thought common sense was prevailing....................................................AAARRRRHHHHH
Ron Hunter  
#2 Posted : 11 July 2012 11:39:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

I think this topic also made the HSE Mythbuster panel. Do you have any asbestos ceilings to worry about? p.s. the 2012 Olympics is hosted by the UK. Events at other Cities are available.
m  
#3 Posted : 11 July 2012 12:39:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

Olympic bunting! What's that all about? Presumably being put up in break times!
Clairel  
#4 Posted : 11 July 2012 12:50:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

I'm confused. Are you unhappy that they are being allowed to put up bunting on the ceilings or that they're not allowed to use cellotape? Either way I'm baffled as to what the problem is?????????????????
peter gotch  
#5 Posted : 11 July 2012 13:17:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

The sellotape may well damage the ceiling. Blue Tac much less likely. It's an FM issue, not H&S (except for the access!)
Steve e ashton  
#6 Posted : 11 July 2012 13:27:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve e ashton

Is Cello tape any stronger than violin tape or is it just bigger? (Sorry I couldn't resist...) Steve
Jane Blunt  
#7 Posted : 11 July 2012 13:41:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

Steve, its a good job I wasn't drinking my coffee or it would now be all over the keyboard. Funnily enough sellotape originated as a cellulose-based product and the c was changed to s for the purpose of registering a trade mark.
sean  
#8 Posted : 11 July 2012 13:47:38(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

I am not too bothered what they stick their bunting up with the issue is that our management have left themselves open to insurance claims if any of the staff have an accident when decorating their area, the email basically says go ahead.... My manager seems to think issuing a ladder to any one that needs it is also ok? Unless of course you allow these practices to happen in your workplace with written permission?????
Clairel  
#9 Posted : 11 July 2012 14:00:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

An open invite to decorate their office with bunting during the olympics? Really? How disgraceful............ You know what. Shoot me down in flames but I don't really care if they stand on a desk to put up decorations (as long as it's a reasonably strong table and they are not obese). In fact a table may be more stable than a ladder! Yes I know it's not an appropriate piece of work equipment but you know what, so what. People have been doing it that way for years. I know I know......I'm irresponsible, I'm not taking such matters seriously, I don't appreciate the real cost of insurance claims. I could never do H&S in offices I just don't see the big dangers there that everyone else seems to. I'll take my chances in court.
Phillips20760  
#10 Posted : 11 July 2012 14:02:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

Ron, But it is still "London 2012" & most events will be held within the 'host city'..
Phillips20760  
#11 Posted : 11 July 2012 14:07:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

Now now Clare, I understand your fustration and it's definately not on my "radar" of priorities, but I personally wouldn't be seen to advocate standing on desks. If anthing else it would dilute my arguments in other areas when dealing with W@H. I wouldn't get my knickers in a twist about someone standing on a desk, but there's no way I could turn a blind eye...
Ron Hunter  
#12 Posted : 11 July 2012 14:46:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Phillips20760 wrote:
Ron, But it is still "London 2012" & most events will be held within the 'host city'..
Don't get me started on this one! I'm also utterly sick-fed-up seeing and hearing references to "Team GB." In a Country which suffered so much internicine strife, this is nothing short of insulting to the population of Northern Ireland. Are we in the UK a unique population in being so confused about the Country we live in?
Clairel  
#13 Posted : 11 July 2012 14:54:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Phillips20760 wrote:
Ron, But it is still "London 2012" & most events will be held within the 'host city'..
Ha ha... You mean you haven't felt 'included' in the LONDON games by the damp squib that has been the olympic flame as it travels it's way round this great nation of ours???? ;-) Can't believe how many people I know have wasted money on tickets for things like synchronised swimming and mens beach volleyball. Just so they can spend even more money on accomodation and food and drinks. And have the pleasure of being shoulder to shoulder with thousands of other people grumbling about the queues, the toilets, the cost of everything and the weather!! Think I'll watch our athletes lose from the comfort of my own living room...when I haven't got better things to do like being out enjoying the lovely countryside :-)
Clairel  
#14 Posted : 11 July 2012 14:55:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Phillips20760 wrote:
but there's no way I could turn a blind eye...
I could, I would, I do................
Victor Meldrew  
#15 Posted : 11 July 2012 15:10:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Victor Meldrew

Know what you mean Clairel - out Saturday with the missus, local KFC being decorated, bloke up a ladder with a brick under one end to make it level as the ground wasn't. Funny thing was the missus spotted it first - my response "come on lets go for a drink". At the end of the day he doesn't need me to tell him that what he is doing is unsafe does he? You could train monkeys quicker.
NEE' ONIONS MATE!  
#16 Posted : 11 July 2012 15:15:11(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NEE' ONIONS MATE!

Victor Meldrew wrote:
Know what you mean Clairel - out Saturday with the missus, local KFC being decorated, bloke up a ladder with a brick under one end to make it level as the ground wasn't. Funny thing was the missus spotted it first - my response "come on lets go for a drink". At the end of the day he doesn't need me to tell him that what he is doing is unsafe does he? You could train monkeys quicker.
especially if youre paying peanuts!
Phillips20760  
#17 Posted : 11 July 2012 15:21:11(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

Victor, But would walk past you if you worked for KFC? I'd hope not. Clare, I couldn't, I wouldn't, I don't.... http://www.hse.gov.uk/sh...lives/posterbuilding.pdf While I appreciate the HSE's stance may be slightly sensualised, it's not that difficult to address this issue without going "OTT". As a minimum a short anendmum to the memo explaining where employees can get some safety steps from would suffice, along with brief instructions for checking their condition. Walking past people standing on desks can't be effective in driving a safe culture and personal responsibiltiy can it...? BR Ian
Victor Meldrew  
#18 Posted : 11 July 2012 15:38:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Victor Meldrew

I don't believe it Phillips20760...... no I'd kick the brick from underneath the ladder.
Victor Meldrew  
#19 Posted : 11 July 2012 15:39:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Victor Meldrew

How do you know what their rate of pay is NEE' ONIONS MATE?
David Bannister  
#20 Posted : 11 July 2012 17:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

How else are they going to get up to the ceiling to use their Blu Tak? And what's wrong with standing on a stable and cleared desktop for a short duration task? Using a swivel chair as an intermediate step is however not recommended (although frequently done in thousands of offices). And what's the problem with using a step ladder?
Clairel  
#21 Posted : 11 July 2012 17:38:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Phillips20760 wrote:
While I appreciate the HSE's stance may be slightly sensualised, BR Ian
errrr....I don't think you meant sensualised. I think you meant sensationalised! Briefly standing on a solid stable desk to put up a banner is a bit different to maintenance work from a chair. Like I said possibly more stable than a stepladder, which to the height of a ceiling can be a bit wobbily. I walk past lots of stuff that's not 'technically' quite right in my job becuase otherwise I'd overload the client with problems, they'd do nothing instead of something and the big stuff would get missed. I save my voice for what matters and that means using my judgement. I'm ok with the fact that others don't agree with that judgment all the time.
Graham Bullough  
#22 Posted : 11 July 2012 18:46:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Those of you who recall my response on 2nd July to the thread "The challenge panel strikes again" won't be surprised to read that I agree with Clairel and david bannister about using tables and desks as temporary platforms provided they are sufficiently stable and sufficently clear, etc. As Clairel has pointed out, a desk can be more stable than a stepladder. In addition to having used a desk from time to time, I've also used solid stable 4 legged chairs for transient tasks where short stepladders weren't available - and maintain my bet on 2nd July that a goodly proportion of other forum users have done likewise. As for swivelling ofice chairs, their inherent swivelling nature renders them wholly unsuitable for use either as temporary work platforms or as intermediate step features for getting on and off tables and desks. Another point: wherever feasible, it's sensible for anyone carrying out tasks like putting up bunting or Christmas decorations in offices to get someone else to assist them by handing them the item/s being put up. As well as saving the person doing the task from having to significantly bend down to pick up the item/s, such assistance helps to speed up the task!
Barnaby again  
#23 Posted : 11 July 2012 20:24:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Barnaby again

sean wrote:
I am not too bothered what they stick their bunting up with the issue is that our management have left themselves open to insurance claims if any of the staff have an accident when decorating their area, the email basically says go ahead.... My manager seems to think issuing a ladder to any one that needs it is also ok? Unless of course you allow these practices to happen in your workplace with written permission?????
- - - and then you'll have Christmas to cope with.
jfw  
#24 Posted : 11 July 2012 23:46:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jfw

david bannister wrote:
How else are they going to get up to the ceiling to use their Blu Tak? And what's wrong with standing on a stable and cleared desktop for a short duration task? Using a swivel chair as an intermediate step is however not recommended (although frequently done in thousands of offices). And what's the problem with using a step ladder?
Why not go for Olympic themes ? You could get them to reach the ceiling by holding competitions in :- - High Jump - Pole Vault - Trampoline or if you want to eliminate work at height, you could go for Archery ! (Using the arrows with the rubber suckers to stick the bunting to the ceiling)
Hally  
#25 Posted : 12 July 2012 08:39:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

We're doing a lot for the olympics and then have to collect it all in 3 weeks. Got a depot in Walthamstow and bad enough finding a hotel now with all the pre-event workers still down there. Thank god i'm on holiday when they start and can avoid the depot again till sometime in September (hopefully).
Rob M  
#26 Posted : 12 July 2012 08:52:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rob M

I have read some comments that made me smile. i to believe that practices reasonably controlled should be allowed and this over restrictive "ooo you cant do that " mentality is why this industry gets a bad press, and why our competing countries get more productivity. People will not genneraly put themselves at risk. Let the bunting flow........
chris42  
#27 Posted : 12 July 2012 10:28:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

I have watched the progression of this discussion topic ( and ones similar to this in the past), and it always strikes me there is an issue which nobody seems to mention. Oddly its one of the things I think about each time, and am I wrong for thinking this way :- If for instance there was an accident say from falling off a desk, or it collapsing from under someone, in an office where everyone is crammed in. You would likely hit other office furniture on the way down and the result would not be pleasant. Even assuming you didn’t catch your eye or teeth, and just say the person suffered a broken arm / leg. Putting aside any possible legal issues, effect on accident stats, or insurance claims that may make next year’s policy go up a bit. If the person was say the company’s best sales person who could no longer drive to see customers, isn’t the cost to the company very significant. The injured person could easily be out of action for 8 to 10 weeks ( so one fifth of a working year). Would the company owner / MD not find this unacceptable? Employee numbers are kept as low as possible in this day and age and I dare say just below the number they probably should have, so I would have thought most workers’ being fully functional is a necessity. I have stood on chairs, desks and I have made my own assessment, and willing to live with any consequences. In work, some people may feel pressured to join in, or take a risk they normally would not or simple don’t have the ability to assess the strength of a piece of office furniture. Although I don’t feel we should nanny people, the idea of standing on desks seems to go against the grain and could have a significant impact on the company. Am I wrong for these thoughts ? No one ever seems to comment on this. Not wishing to be a killjoy, someone must change the lights in the office (or other such duties), who has a ladder and any appropriate training, couldn’t they be asked to put up decorations. Perhaps false ceilings should come with integral hooks so decorations can be put up from ground level with a pole. There just has to be a better answer. I can’t help but wonder if modern chipboard desks come with ratings like gloves (puncture, wear, cut etc). Desks could have ratings for holding small /medium /large people, and shoe type from trainer to 6 inch stiletto.
Clairel  
#28 Posted : 12 July 2012 10:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

chris42 wrote:
If for instance there was an accident say from falling off a desk, or it collapsing from under someone, in an office where everyone is crammed in. You would likely hit other office furniture on the way down and the result would not be pleasant. Even assuming you didn’t catch your eye or teeth, and just say the person suffered a broken arm / leg. ......... If the person was say the company’s best sales person who could no longer drive to see customers, isn’t the cost to the company very significant. The injured person could easily be out of action for 8 to 10 weeks ( so one fifth of a working year).
If a meteor hit earth we could all die.......... 9.9999 times out of 10 standing on a solid desk to put up bunting is not going to cause injury. It's not about removing all risk. Try to remember that.
RayRapp  
#29 Posted : 12 July 2012 11:20:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

When or doc controller asked for the starters to be removed because of glare from the overhead diffusers I asked our M&E chap to do it when the doc controller went home. He asked me if it was ok to stand on the desk, I said "Of course not - wait 5 minutes until I go home..." It's called reality.
chris42  
#30 Posted : 12 July 2012 11:45:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Ok I agree if a meteor kills everyone the MD probably will not complain about lack of sales. Low risk “9.9999 out of 10” :- The problem I have is the HSE had a campaign about 2006 / 7 about falls from low height, that suggested it was not low risk. Indeed when you Google two HSE pdf’s come up, one shows someone falling from a sturdy looking bar stool and one from an office desk, each with the wording below. So is this activity as low as risk as we might like to think it is, the only stats I have are via the HSE. Falls from a low height can be a high risk. Last year, over 2000 people had serious accidents while working at low height. Most needed a long time off to recover from injuries such as a fractured skull. Make sure you plan ahead so your workers will know how to use the right equipment safely at any height. For advice visit hse.gov.uk/falls or call HSE Infoline on 0845 345 0055. Protect your business from falls. Lastly, I agree you don’t have to eliminate all risk, indeed Legislation / ACOPs etc confirm this. However I was not taking about legal duty or even moral duty, I was considering business risk. So my question stands do people think I’m wrong to think like this, Clairel I don’t wish to put words in your mouth so to speak, but your response seems to suggest you feel I am wrong – fair enough, I understand your view and thank you for responding.
chris42  
#31 Posted : 12 July 2012 11:53:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Ray Thanks also for the response, I do understand, I have been in a similar situation, where something had been done and could only have happened with someone on a desk. I have also been in a situation where the shop floor employees had a go at me for being complicit with such a situation, and having double standards. It did nothing for my credibility for other safety issues, which took a while to rebuild.
Graham Bullough  
#32 Posted : 12 July 2012 12:18:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Chris42 - here are some thoughts which might be of use in response to yours at #27: 1) Office desks, including modern ones made of laminated thick chipboard, all seem to be very sturdy and thus useable as improvised platforms. 2) Persons who put up decorations in offices, etc., tend to do so as able and willing volunteers. Those who don't like climbing on desks/going up stepladders for non-work purposes either won't offer to do so or will decline if asked. In fact the same probably applies to work-related purposes in some workplaces, e.g. putting up/taking down wall displays in schools. From long experience of schools I gained the general impression that employees who dislike such work (perhaps because of actual/perceived problems with their balance) are not compelled to do it. In most schools there are other employees who are able and willing to do such tasks for them. If not, it's not crucial that material is displayed higher than anyone can reach if their feet remain on the floor. 3) In reality, out of the number of people who use chairs and desks as fleetingly transient platforms, how many experience falls and injury? Very few I suspect. If so, this tends to reinforce an impression that the actual or perceived LIKELIHOOD of harm occurring is very very low, as opposed to thoughts about the worst possible SEVERITY of harm which might occur. (On a much wider scale, I venture that this sort of thinking, even when it is wrong, tends to underpin why people take all sorts of risks in their lives whether at work, home or during leisure. For example, I guess that people who use mobile phones while driving mistakenly think that doing so won't impair their driving ability and therefore they are unlikely to be injured/involved in collisions which bring various adverse consequences. No doubt the same thinking applies regarding their likelihood of being spotted and penalised by the police.) 4) Another factor could be a sense of self-preservation which influences people to take more care than normal while doing something unusual and vaguely risky like standing on a chair or desk.
sean  
#33 Posted : 12 July 2012 12:40:38(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

I seem to have stirred up a bit of a Hornets nest here! My main concern isn't the decorations or how they are put up its the communication used telling the staff its ok to stick stuff up without providing the safe means to do so. I hope that clarifies my point?
Graham Bullough  
#34 Posted : 12 July 2012 12:42:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

As mentioned in some earlier responses, there are situations where work tasks cannot be done without standing on office desks. For example, the open plan office where I used to work had clusters of 4 or more desks located against each other and some clusters were located adjacent to windows. Thus, when we had occasional visits from contractors to clean the insides of the windows, they used their low lightweight stepladders to gain access to the windows which had desks in front of them. Furthermore, employees tended to help the contractors by clearing the areas of desk which they needed to walk on. Also, as there were large desk clusters beneath some of the overhead fluorescent lights, it's extremely likely that maintenance staff would use the desks for access to renew tubes.
Lawlee45239  
#35 Posted : 12 July 2012 13:36:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

jfw wrote:
david bannister wrote:
How else are they going to get up to the ceiling to use their Blu Tak? And what's wrong with standing on a stable and cleared desktop for a short duration task? Using a swivel chair as an intermediate step is however not recommended (although frequently done in thousands of offices). And what's the problem with using a step ladder?
Why not go for Olympic themes ? You could get them to reach the ceiling by holding competitions in :- - High Jump - Pole Vault - Trampoline or if you want to eliminate work at height, you could go for Archery ! (Using the arrows with the rubber suckers to stick the bunting to the ceiling)
hahaha brill !!!!!!!!
Mr.Flibble  
#36 Posted : 12 July 2012 13:39:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Mr.Flibble

hmmmm an office desk with a weight rating, slide up hand rails and slide out access steps...I think their could be a market there! (c) Copyright Mr. Flibble 2012
Lawlee45239  
#37 Posted : 12 July 2012 13:42:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Mr.Flibble wrote:
hmmmm an office desk with a weight rating, slide up hand rails and slide out access steps...I think their could be a market there! (c) Copyright Mr. Flibble 2012
very good!!
Graham Bullough  
#38 Posted : 12 July 2012 16:15:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Mr.Flibble In view of the increasing numbers of obese people of all ages in the UK, remember to ensure that the safe working load of your versatile office desk is sufficiently high to protect you from any future accusations of bariatric discrimination! Also, good job you claimed copyright for your idea so as to warn off the hordes of people who will think your idea is the best thing since the introduction of sliced bread and therefore be tempted to emulate it. (Does anyone happen to know what was the best thing BEFORE sliced bread?!) Anyhow, if you've only just hit on the idea, those of us reading your response above should consider ourselves to be highly privileged to be the first to know. We might also speculate if it will be marketed as "The Flibble" or under some other name which you intend to keep secret until the grand launch. Also, if commercial furniture companies are a bit slow to realise the brilliance of your idea and don't fight to be chosen by you to do the manufacturing and selling under licence, you'd better apply soon to appear on the next series of TV's "Dragons' Den"!!!!! :-) (That's enough from me now in view of my continuing aspiration to brevity on this forum!)
Phillips20760  
#39 Posted : 12 July 2012 17:22:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

It seems to me that the fear of being 'kill joys' or practising 'risk avoidance' has caused a certain clouding of judgment. I think this thread is (another) example of how, if not careful, we can swing the pendulum far too far in the other way. Is it not reasonably forseeable that allowing people to stand on desks will eventually end up in a potentially serious accident? The stats quoted by Chris42 seem to point towards this - as does the HSE's "Shattered Lives" campaign. And as far double standards, how can you expect to control work at (similar) height in other areas when you are turning a blind eye in the offices? "Why do I need a stepladder to change the light bulb guv? The sales staff are standing on desks all the time....." Sensible risk managment is about assessing risks in the real world, I agree. It is not about ignoring obvious risks. If it can be controlled then maybe you will think it's fine, but don't give staff carte blanche to start jumping about on desks...
chris42  
#40 Posted : 12 July 2012 18:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Graham Bullough wrote:
Mr.Flibble In view of the increasing numbers of obese people of all ages in the UK, remember to ensure that the safe working load of your versatile office desk is sufficiently high to protect you from any future accusations of bariatric discrimination!
Graham I thought you had already concluded that desks were "very sturdy". Or are you changing sides in the discussion?. I have been involved in a number of office reorganisations, and have helped pick up more than one desk that looked solid to find it was not. Modern chipboard desks are sturdy when new, but once moved a few times, soon deteriorate. Some were I think just held together by shear will power of the person controlling the budget for new furniture. Are you saying you have never come across this phenomena. Everyone is trying to save money including desk manufacturers, so why would they design desks capable of holding an adults weight? So did the HSE get it wrong in their campaign ? or just views changing due to pressure from outside. Sean No hornets, just healthy discussion. Would be nice to know the view of the other 600+ people who viewed the topic. I admit I am playing devil’s advocate here, though I would be uncomfortable allowing this to happen, so would not (If others chose differently then that is up to them), I would ensure they had another option. I get concerned about the current trend of not wanting to appear; overzealous, a jobs worth or a killjoy and wonder if some people views are influenced by this (not the people on this thread I will add, they most definitely have their own opinions). I therefore like to put an opposing point of view, if just to make others who read this think about the issue for themselves and make up their own minds. I feel debate and discussion are good, if a good few people want me to stop I will.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.