Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
B Mitchell  
#1 Posted : 01 May 2013 10:04:48(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
B Mitchell

I work for a medium sized organisation (1200 employees) which is spread across Scotland. As legally required we have a corporate health and safety policy. Within the organisation there are two Directorates who have a number of specific inherent hazards, account for the largest numbers of employees and have unique management structures. My consideration/question is, should these Directorates have their own specific health and safety policies which take account of their high risk activities, their management structure and fit with the corporate policy I would appreciate any comments giving reasons for either supporting Directorate policies or the status quo (Brian)
bilbo  
#2 Posted : 01 May 2013 10:09:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bilbo

I am confused - title says Directorate H&S Committees - your post then talks of policies?? A little clarification would be helpful
B Mitchell  
#3 Posted : 01 May 2013 10:32:02(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
B Mitchell

Sorry, the subject is Health and Safety Policies
David Bannister  
#4 Posted : 01 May 2013 10:43:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

If by Policy you mean the single page commitment that goes on a notice board, then it should be issued by the body that employees recognise as their employer. If you mean the real meat of how you manage H&S then this too should reflect the way people work. Thus a licensing dept will not have much use for procedures on confined space entry, whilst a building maintence dept may not need info on ionising radiation. An all-encompassing H&S manual will be full of stuff that is irrelevant to many users. Better in my opinion to be specific.
CarlT  
#5 Posted : 01 May 2013 10:47:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
CarlT

Assuming these "Directorates" are not totally autonomous I can't see the sense in having different H&S Policies. The responsibilities for h&s should be clear in your overall management systems and the hazardous activities should be accounted for in your risk assessments and safe systems of work.
bilbo  
#6 Posted : 01 May 2013 11:31:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bilbo

OK - why not have a Corporate one page overarching Statement of Policy - then have sets of procedures that relate specifically to the work of the different parts of the organisations business (all of which must comply and be in keeping with the Policy Statement)
gramsay  
#7 Posted : 01 May 2013 13:05:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
gramsay

Similarly to the OP, we have a medium sized workforce (2,500 ish) and also two distinct operational divisions doing very different work, with completely different management structures. We have a single OH&S policy and a single set of policies/procedures etc supporting it. What differs is risk assessment, and activity-specific guidance (if needed) but that's only because they're for activities unique to one part of the business. We might have a cleaner using a ladder in one division and a construction worker in another. The risk assessments will be different, but the procedure by which their managers selected, purchased, maintained and inspected their ladders are identical.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.