Repeals, revocation and amendments. Options  Watch this topic  Print this topic » Normal Threaded

Previous Topic Next Topic

firesafety101		#1 Posted : 02 April 2015 15:24:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user		Just came across this while looking for something else: http://www.hse.gov.uk/le.../repeals-revocations.htm Looks as if wearing hard hats on construction sites is mandatory, according to HSE?
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

RayRapp		#2 Posted : 02 April 2015 15:37:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user		The wearing of hard hats on construction sites has been mandatory since the Construction (Head Protection) Regulations 1989 came into force.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

paulw71		#3 Posted : 02 April 2015 15:59:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user		RayRapp wrote: The wearing of hard hats on construction sites has been mandatory since the Construction (Head Protection) Regulations 1989 came into force. Im not sure that is strictly true. I thought it was the case that if there was a risk of head injury then it was mandatory they must be worn. HSE website guidance also concurs with the above. Happy to be proved wrong though.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Alfasev		#4 Posted : 02 April 2015 16:06:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user		I got it FireSafety101 but i know anyway, the Construction (Head Protection) Regulations 1989 has been repealed, back 1012 i think.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Dean Elliot		#5 Posted : 07 April 2015 07:55:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user		I'm sure your tongue is firmly in your cheek FireSafety101.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

RayRapp		#6 Posted : 07 April 2015 08:56:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user		paulw71 wrote: RayRapp wrote: The wearing of hard hats on construction sites has been mandatory since the Construction (Head Protection) Regulations 1989 came into force. Im not sure that is strictly true. I thought it was the case that if there was a risk of head injury then it was mandatory they must be worn. HSE website guidance also concurs with the above. Happy to be proved wrong though. No, you are correct with the caveat which I did not feel inclined to add for brevity...Sikhs are also absolved before anyone mentions that.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Users browsing this topic

Guest