Rank: Super forum user 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
Xmas is coming and someone has to pay for the Bolly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
If the construction firms have a proper system in place the HSE would not find anything wrong.
Bring it on! - it might drive a few cowboys to the wall and level the playing field a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
What's the issue here?
If there are breaches, it is right that they pay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
"Contractors hit by charges under the controversial HSE Fee for Intervention scheme have seen their bills jump by 40% since it started."
I'm afraid I've no sympathy for those who didn't learn the lesson first time round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
I also don't see the issue, unless the HSE are being overly pedantic about things. You can almost anywhere find a minor material breach (or at least something wide open to interpretation).
Did any of us expect the recovered costs to ever go down ? Get everyone used to the idea, then ramp up the new revenue stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It's a funny thing...when FFI was first mooted on this forum the general consensus was how amoral it was, conflict of interest, only large companies will be hit, employees and consultants will be in a vulnerable position, etc. Now it's a case of 'the offender pays' and it's the best thing since sliced bread!
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.