Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
MaxPayne  
#1 Posted : 01 February 2016 07:18:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

Looking for a view on this please. The business is moving from an inner city depot with parking and good transport links to an industrial unit on the outskirts of the city with little parking and no bus service. I've been asked if I would risk assess several routes which the project manager has mapped for staff parking locally and then completing their journey into work on-foot. Some of those routes are 40 minutes and cross under motorways via underpasses and through an industrial estate with high HGV movement. The PM is also looking at options for a mini-bus service or to persuade a bus company to run a route, but I question the purpose of the risk assessment as (1) this is outside of working hours/business (2) there's probably not much we can introduce as control measures and (3) will we assume responsibility by undertaking the process or set a precedence for the rest of the organisation? Any thoughts please?
Invictus  
#2 Posted : 01 February 2016 08:05:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Why? I have never worked for a company who has risk assessed me attending work, it is up to people how they get there!
bob youel  
#3 Posted : 01 February 2016 08:22:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

If U mean staff coming into a permanent place of work in the morning from their home and then going home after work from that permanent place of work then employers H&S, employment duties etc. do not apply I appreciate the employers concerns etc. but this is a HR/management issue - assist by all means. However the risk assessment process/format can be used as a tool to support all areas but it should be used under the overall risk management banner of the business as a whole and there are mini bus companies clambering for work out there so that area should not be a problem& yes the more U take on yourselves the more liability U have
Alan Haynes  
#4 Posted : 01 February 2016 08:38:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alan Haynes

Invictus wrote:
Why? I have never worked for a company who has risk assessed me attending work, it is up to people how they get there!
Well I have! When an office was set up in the area to the North of Kings Cross Station, in the late '80s, the area was 'renowned' for street based prostitution. Management decided that the risk to female staff walking back to the Station area [no public bus service] was too great. [However, I'm not certain there was a formal risk assessment - just an application of Common Sense by senior management]. Therefore female staff were told to book a cab [Account set up for the purpose] if they were walking alone back from the offices after dark. The 'facility' was regularly used, especially in Winter. Was it necessary - almost definitely. Great for staff morale.
Invictus  
#5 Posted : 01 February 2016 08:58:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Might be great for staff morale, but not leagally required.
Alan Haynes  
#6 Posted : 01 February 2016 09:21:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alan Haynes

Invictus wrote:
Might be great for staff morale, but not leagally required.
True - but who wants to work for a company who only does the bare minimum required for their staff welfare and wellbeing? Its an appalling attitude to take Second point - going back to the original posting. Max said "The business is moving from an inner city depot with parking and good transport links to an industrial unit on the outskirts of the city with little parking and no bus service. I've been asked if I would risk assess several routes which the project manager has mapped for staff parking locally and then completing their journey into work on-foot. Some of those routes are 40 minutes and cross under motorways via underpasses and through an industrial estate with high HGV movement. " As the staff were employed elsewhere, and their ways of getting to work are changed by the relocation of the offices, perhaps there is an onus on the company to consider the effects of the change. Also - I hope the 'bosses', aren't parking at the new offices, but walking like the rest [some hope!] In the good old days of strong unions - all this would have been covered before any move is agree [including walking time payments etc etc, as staff could spend over an hour extra walking to/from work]
Invictus  
#7 Posted : 01 February 2016 09:30:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

No it wouldn't, walking time payments don't think so even when the unions were strong. I personally wouldn't want to work for a company who told me how to get to work. I don't even like the fact that they produce standards that are also taken to how you behave outside work that can result in disciplinary measures
ExDeeps  
#8 Posted : 01 February 2016 11:36:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ExDeeps

Normally the journey to and from work is outwith the business responsabilities; However, by relocating from one area to another, with what appears to be poor parking/commuting compared to the current location i think there is a wider "business risk" issue to be addressed. So maybe a "risk assessment" is required, just not a "Health and Safety Risk Assessment". Precedents have been set ( I know of a local authority and a large utility co) for instance increased travel time and costs have resulted in either ex gratia or on going payment to cover the extra time and costs etc and also there is a risk to the business that some stff will find better offers else where - Again ,not directly "Health and Safety" but consider the effect if you lose all your fire wardens, or even a couple of fire wardens over the 6 months following the move - that is a Health and safety issue Slightly off topic but worth a think
Binniem  
#9 Posted : 01 February 2016 14:36:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Binniem

Lets think about this sensibly, HASAWA 1974, section 2 General duties of employers to their employees. (1)It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees. The "at work" bit really sums it up, how employees get to work isn't in the scope of HASAWA, it may however be a case for HR, change of terms and conditions etc....
JohnW  
#10 Posted : 01 February 2016 14:52:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

MaxPayne, I would tell your boss the issue should be managed by HR. They can do a (non H&S) risk assessment, you could assist with your experience.
MaxPayne  
#11 Posted : 01 February 2016 15:23:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

All, Many thanks indeed for your feedback. You've confirmed my thoughts, but it's really useful sometimes to get feedback and ideas from peers. Thanks again.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.