Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
TudorWilliams  
#1 Posted : 10 February 2016 20:33:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
TudorWilliams

I am currently reviewing proposed changes to the nvq 5. I wondered if other members and forum users were also part of this consultation and wanted to share views on the proposed changes. Similarly those who are not party to the changes but have a view on the level 5 as it stands or what it needs.
simon73  
#2 Posted : 11 February 2016 09:47:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
simon73

I'm also reviewing the proposals for change to NVQ 5, they are interesting proposals but i'm disappointed to see no movement on L6 as yet from C&G.

My advice to potential candidates might be to enroll and make sure you are registered before September 16!!
TudorWilliams  
#3 Posted : 11 February 2016 20:12:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
TudorWilliams

Yes dissapointed at there being no level 6. Im bracing myself for the questions as to why 2 level 5s will be so different. With this new proposal having 16 mandatory units and a project i can see the logic in your statement. I cant see how though im going to explain the difference to employers and candidates alike.
linda xc  
#4 Posted : 14 February 2016 15:02:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
linda xc

hi

I think what I am saying is right, but please correct me if its a bit wrong.

All NVQs are being re-written to meet the NOS, so the standards do have to change. I don't believe there is enough level 6 material in the re-write to increase its level from a 5 to a 6, but there is enough included to meet the IOSH membership criterion for Grad.IOSH status.

The fact that it becomes not wholly work-based and is increasing in size is commercially scary, some assessors will find that they have to work as a team to assess these new standards.

I am hoping that they do make some units optional - there is a prosecutions unit and a control of contractors unit. There won't be many job roles that a person actually does both of those actions with enough regularity to provide evidence on competence.
It is nice to see that behavioural and inductions are being given a larger part in the qualification.

regards

Linda
TudorWilliams  
#5 Posted : 16 February 2016 18:35:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
TudorWilliams

I am pretty sure you are right. I worry that the information I have been given shows all units as mandatory! This would set the new level 5 as very different to the existing one. I can't see that all the units are achievable and I would have my doubts about delivery and assessment as well.

Watch this space I feel there's some mileage in this
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.