Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 March 2003 15:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I'm posting this just because I have to tell someone ! I have just returned from visiting a warehouse. While there I looked through some recent accident inquiry reports and found the following : An employee was loading sacks of product into the back of a lorry. Because of a physical obstruction (railway lines in front of the loading dock) the lorry could not back up completely to the dock. A large plank was used to bridge the gap. This had been normal practice since they changed from using rail cars to lorries, 6 years ago. Recently, the employee fell of the plank. The sackbarrow, the sack (50kg) and the plank all landed on top of him, in that order. Result - a fractured femur. Recommended action - As the injury was directly caused by a re-inforcing bar on the sackbarrow hitting the man's leg, remove the re-inforcing bar. The result of modifying this and all other sackbarrows in the warehouse wil be that, the next time someone falls off the plank, the re-inforcing bar will not be able to come in contact and injure the leg. The man is still in hospital, all of the sackbarrows have been modified and the railway lines (and plank) are still there As I said, don't laugh, there is a lesson in there somewhere. If anyone want's a copy of the accident report, let me have a fax number. (it's in French) Merv Newman
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 March 2003 19:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie I suppose it's a better solution than removing everybody's leg so that it can't get injured! Laurie
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 March 2003 22:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Craythorne As it is a French accident, I am surprised the corrective action wasn't vetoed!!!!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 April 2003 09:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor - et aucun doute qu'ils voudront modifier l'Euronorm pour des sackbarrows et nous obliger à changer tout les nôtres aussi!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.