Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 March 2006 16:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Petrie Interesting article on the risks from gravestones http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4860360.stm
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 March 2006 17:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Descarte Yeh this was in the news a year or 2 ago
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 March 2006 17:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Aidan Toner I think the NEW angle on this story is that the Ombudsman for England and Wales has now set him/herself up as an expert on safety and cut across industry best practice priciples. NB-A headstone which fails the topple test can remain in situ as long as you inspect/OR hazard sign it??
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.