Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 March 2007 09:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Teresa Green
Are there any legal implications of a Client approving a method statement as opposed to accepting it?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 March 2007 10:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Teresa

Accepting, approving or reviewing method statements is largely a matter of semantics. After an incident, a well known company has allegedly gone from approving method statements to reviewing them. I am not sure that legally there is any difference because health and safety is usually a shared liability between all duty holders.

Ray
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 March 2007 11:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim-F
It is the responsibility of the principle contractor to review and approve a suitable and sufficient method statement, if this is not done and documented and things go badly wrong then the HSE will be looking for a paper trail
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.