Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 June 2007 08:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Hoskins
According to Dick on the Dick & Judy show yesterday (what a sad life I lead...) it is now the fault of health & safety that the Tony Hancock 'Go to work on an egg' ads have been banned from being reshown.

He referred to H&S a number of times during the item even though it is clear to most people (I think) that it was banned by advertising standards as being unhealthy because it depicts what they say is an unbalanced diet.

Personally I don't agree with the ban anyway, but that is another matter...

A
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 June 2007 08:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Adams CMIOSH
I thought this was bizarre too. It was explained away by stating that it did not promote a balanced diet. How do adverts for chocolate bars get passed then?

Rant over!

Dave
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 June 2007 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lulu
From the news reports I saw it was because it promoted eating eggs every working day (implying 5 at least).

Therefore the 'Mars a day helps you work rest and play' would be banned under the same principle.



Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 June 2007 11:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Alan

Indeed, good point.

Conversely I was watching a programme recently about the tragic deaths of people in holiday chalets and apartments due to carbon monoxide poisoning; it was strange to hear how often the words 'health and safety' were uttered in a positive manner. Cake and eat it springs to mind.

Ray

Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 June 2007 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap
I tell you what does my head in. The advert for cream eggs during Coronation street. Dreadful.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 June 2007 12:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By RoseR
A friend of a friend of an ex collegue etc told me that Richard Madely had quite a few clashes with H&S at one of the TV companies he worked at ie. was told he couldn't do wanted he wanted to, therefore never misses an opportunity to put the boot in with regard to H&S. It does seem to be a reoccuring theme with him..

Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 June 2007 15:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jon Vitta
Your right


watching that is sad

Admin  
#8 Posted : 25 June 2007 10:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
We get blamed for everything; one of my colleagues sent me the 'humorous' thing about Nelson and Trafalgar etc. One of the things H&S gets blamed for in that is the DDA; nowt to de wi me, guv,

John
Admin  
#9 Posted : 25 June 2007 10:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs
"Therefore the 'Mars a day helps you work rest and play' would be banned under the same principle."

Lulu ... it was.

Not sure if it was the "a day" bit or the claims of helping work rest and play that got it stopped, but it was stopped a couple of (few) years ago.

When was the last time you heard that? Shows what a good jingle can achieve.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 25 June 2007 16:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
They also blamed H&S for the decision to ban that Christian girl from wearing a religious ring at school last week on the news.

The rights and wrongs are not for this forum, but once again H&S was used to justify an unpopular decision. Ho hum...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.