Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 March 2008 10:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JHiller Hi Can anyone help. I have checked all the legislation and ACOPS and nothing tell me for sheltered housing where there is no one managing the property after 5pm what detection unit should be installed. At the moment all flats have a fire detection unit that is linked to the main board. WHen a tenant burns their toast the alarm for the whole building goes off and residents automatically call the fire brigade. Does anyone know if we can disconnect the fire detection units from the tenants accomodation and replace them with units that only go off in the tenants flats. It will be their responsibility to call Invicta or the fire brigade if it is a real fire. where do I stand legally? Thanks
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 March 2008 17:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ashley Wood Hi Jennifer, you are walking on dangerous ground as the fire service's across the UK are targeting sheltered schemes in a big way at the moment. Most of my time is spent assessing schemes for various landlords. The questions you should ask yourself are; 1) Are the flats linked by enclosed walkways/corridors? 2) Are there communal facilities If the answer is yes to these questions then you must install a full BS5839 part 1 2002 L1 system with automatic fire service link via a call centre. If the flats are suffering unwanted alarms due to toast etc then perhaps you need to assess the position and type of detector being used. If you disconnect the flats from the system this will become non compliant under the RR(FS)O 2005.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 March 2008 07:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Ashley, Where does it state that a full BS5839 part 1 2002 L1 system with automatic fire service link via a call centre is required in a sheltered scheme? Additionally what are the relevant breaches of the RR(FS)O? Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 March 2008 07:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 Could you let me know as well please Ashley.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 March 2008 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ashley Wood As I said, do the flats open on to an enclosed corridor? If this is that type of scheme then the recommendation is for a system that will provide the highest level of life safety. This is detailed within BS 5839 part 1 2002, 8.1.2 section 2 page 17 second to last paragraph. It is also recommended that if the occupants of the building are vulnerable then an automatic means for emergency service alert should be considered. I know 'considered' does not mean 'must' and recommendations are just that, a recommendation. Within the sleeping guide RR(FS)O page 55 refers to an L2 system but read note 2. Page 56 backs up what I said about false alarms. To be able to disconnect the flats alarms from the main system would require absolute confidence that the passive construction measures for that building are 100% i.e no holes in walls, correct standard of fire linings, no letter boxes in flats doors, flat doors fire resistant etc etc. If a fire should occur within a flat after the detector has been disconnected from the main system and the occupant is overcome and can not alert others or call the fire service, what then? Multiple deaths. Most people do not realise that the detector within the fire effected flat is there not to protect the person living in the flat but to alert the other occupants within the building to enable them to escape. this is the same in hotel rooms. So if you consider this in in this light then the others are at risk by the disconnection of the detector from the main system. trust me on this, you will have a very difficult time convincing the fire service that disconnection of the flats detectors is the correct way of solving the false alarm activations. Also, if no warden is on site at night and the alarm goes off again they will expect to see a monitored alarm link to a central station/centre. The people who are now tenants within sheltered schemes are older then the schemes were ever intended, and as such suffer frailty, immobility, deafness, dementia etc. In a lot of cases they deserve proper residential care rather than housing in a sheltered scheme. I comment on this because they need a higher level of fire safety then before, not a reduction. Finally, would the folks who have questioned my previous answer be able to stand up in court and say that they did all they could to protect the persons that the RR(FS)O is most aimed at protecting - the vulnerable? Off my soap box and over to you : - )
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 March 2008 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 If the answer is yes to these questions then you must install a full BS5839 part 1 2002 L1 system with automatic fire service link via a call centre. We were questioning the 'must' in your response Ashley. Quite rightly it seems.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 06 April 2008 16:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin dilworth you can have the alarm go off in the flat by having a full evec delay put into the program....the cause of the alarm can then be investigated by the tenant... if the alarm in the flat is not silenced after a set time (5 mins) then the alarm goes into full evec.. all new apartment blocks shopping centres court buildings etc have this system in place
Admin  
#8 Posted : 06 April 2008 16:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By pluto Ashley is quite correct in his arguments and conclusions. Fire and Rescue Services ARE looking carefully at these schemes as many do have all the characteristics of residential care. Often the service provider, (for care) is separated from the building provider by the thinnest of Chinese walls and is simply a legal construction that has no bearing on the risks involved. Many of these 'sheltered housing' schemes should actually be registered by NCSC. In addition to the alarm requirements, the need for suppression systems is also being muted as without 24 hr staff/manager cover, (too expensive with working time directive), the residents are being left to fend for themselves. To equate them to residents in flats is disingenuous, as many are unable to self-rescue due to their age and/or disability. One major provider actively advertises for people with dementia and mental health problems. I have no problem with this but you cannot then just abandon them and hope the fire service gets there in time.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.