Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 May 2008 21:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Sutton
L&G ,,,,2 operatives on a site i visit take great delight in cutting their vests down to the bottom flourescent stripe..

apart from the obvious "interfering with something provided for H&S"...

Q. is there a legal length they should be? how many stripes are needed for general construction site work?

your thoughts
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 May 2008 22:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Accidentia
Pete

Hi-vis is made to EN471 'Specification for Hi-Vis Clothing' The EN requires that there is a certain minimum amount of background material. For example, class 3 garments, which offer the highest level of conspicuity, should have 0.8m2 of background and 0.2m2 of retro-reflective material. If your staff are reducing the amount of background material, the garments may not afford the necessary degree of conspicuity. You may then be falling foul of reg. 4 of PPE Regs about the garment being "suitable."

Suggest you ascertain first why they are doing this. Is the garment chaffing, interfering with other clothing, their work or is this some weird attempt at making hi-vis a fashion accessory? If any of the former, you may need to look at other garments that will achieve the same end. If the latter follow your disciplinary procedures.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 17 May 2008 21:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Sutton
just as i thought... thanks
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 May 2008 09:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CW
I'll take a guess that they are ceiling fitters.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.