Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Derrick Robinson
Is an NVQ 4 equivalent to a degree?
I did my NVQ 4 at the same time that my daughter was completing her A levels and starting a degree and on many levels it was clearly not equivalent.
However it was demanding, it developed me considerably in my professional role and it was appropriate for me at that time. IOSH ultimately recognised its appropriateness by granting me membership.
The reality is that this profession needs both people who follow an academic route and those who follow a more vocational path, IOSH recognise this by continuing to provide both routes into membership. Many people will continue to enter the profession without qualification as some employers will continue to value experienced people who can retrain over qualified people without industry experience from outside their organisations.
Out of interest I am currently studying part time for an MSc. All of the people I have worked with are full time H and S professionals and they are all diploma qualified. I have not found so far that I am at any disadvantage when compared to them. Employers will have different needs and will judge peoples qualifications and experience accordingly. Similarly as professionals we should judge fellow professionals according to the appropriateness of their skill set to the job they are trying to do. With great respect to the original questioner I think you may have missed the point, don't worry about what is equivalent to what, select the qualifications and professional development that are appropriate to your job and where you want to go with your career and good luck.
Derrick
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rommel
NEBOSH or a degree + skill portfolio + peer review (if successful) = CMIOSH
NVQ + open assessment + peer review (if successful) = cmiosh
Can someone spot out the difference in the final achievement?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By ChrisinMalta
I think there is often some confusion over the term, "level". A flock of birds is composed of many individual birds, but each bird does not constitute a flock!
Regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sen Sar
Congrats Adams777
I have 2 Degrees and levels 4 & 5 NVQ (not H&S related I must add).
You must not be put off by some of the snobbery which seems to exsist. YOU have achieved this and should be proud.
I think it makes little difference which route we take the main thing is we take it!
I have attended may may training sessions and completed many courses both short and long and each time I have taken something from all of them.
Just remember we NEVER stop learning.
Good luck for the future.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Cartwright
My my we have touched a nerve.
Right as I explained in my first answer to the original question which was, is the NVQ Level 4 equivelant to a Degree?
Answer no
My answer is based on the following facts, which are.
A Degree takes 3 years full time study at least, 6 years if you are studying part time, 43 assignments and at least 5 exams.
When I studied NEBOSH Cert, Dip 1 & Dip 2 (all part time) it took just under 2.5 years, 10 assignments and 7 exams. Which was the same for most students.
NVQ Level 4, one poster has already said it took them 13 months of part time study, 7 assignments, no exams. I also know of people who took far less time to complete the NVQ Level 4.
If you think it is the equivelant you are entitled to your opinion.
As for NVQ's being restrictive.
Example
A student works in the construction industry. All his evidence will be based on this industry.
Where as those studying Degree or Diploma will study a broader range of subjects.
You guys who opted for the NVQ route must be far cleverer than those who opted for Degree/Diploma route, as it takes you far less time to absorb the equivelant information and are not even required to do exams. I'm impressed.
As for the system of NVQ. When completing my D32/33 Trainer/Assessor course, which took less than a day I might add. All I had to do was show someone how to do a particular task. Then I had to assess another person doing a task who had been trained by someone else, fill out a few forms and that was it. Job done.
As for being a absolute know it all, your way off the mark. That is why I'm continueing with my studies and I continue to fill out my CPD. I wish I could say I learn something new every day, but I think I've got it down to about every other now.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sen Sar
I thinks its like learning to drive
You take lessons, take test, get piece of paper that says you can drive.
Reality after all of the above you REALLY learn to drive.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MCK
Or going through your apprenticeship - once you are a tradesman that is when you really learn your trade.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sen Sar
Steve
While I appreciate your point of view, you seem to be a little preoccupied with the time it takes to achieve either qualification therefore it comes across that the you believe that the longer it takes the more significant the qualification.
Having, as stated in my previous posting, done both I feel the NVQ is more flexible timewise and can be achieved quicker depending on the individuals input.
I didnt feel I gained more or less form either Degree or NVQ it, to me, was just a different way and in some ways the NVQ's "hands on approach" gave me greater flexibility.
As to whether they are equilvant, I think its a close call.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Cartwright
Sen Sar
As I said in one of my earlier posts to this question.
I'm not knocking the NVQ and I believe it can be very useful. However I do not believe it is the equivelant of a Degree which was the original question.
As for the time it takes to do a degree, 3 years full time study, 6 years part time are you telling me that the NVQ will have the equivelant information in it.
If you are then why do so many students go off to uni for 3 years run up debts in excess of £15000 when all they had to do was a NVQ in approximately a third of the time, no exams for a fraction of the price.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Glyn Atkinson
For me personally, it was a difference between learning stuff parrot fashion on a given day under a stress situation where my failure was assured, without any remote chance of that subject matter being part of my working life, or setting out to show what my workload actually was worth by displaying to peers that I could perform a job of work to my qualified level, contributing to actual processes and procedures and making changes that affect actual workplaces.
I am rubbish at passing exams, good at my job - I therefore chose the correct choice for me, personally.
Learning from theory is great, but like any safety subject, you have to negotiate with real people in real situations.
You are dealing with personalities, people, ongoing situations, problems to solve, and the theory route is nothing to do with the University of Life !!
That's totally regardless of level of qualification and time taken to achieve those qualifications !!
Some (not all) degree qualified people have never been in a work situation and flounder !
Also consider that a lot of NVQ routers pay their own way while working all hours to complete their course - not the easy route that the original thread author was implying - I'm better than you, touches of one of Harry Enfield's characters.
What's next, higher pay for degree status only?? Let them eat cake !
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sen Sar
I have a slight issue with the term "full time" exactly how many hours per week are spent on study ?
As for students, ohhhhhhhh thats another debate!!!
I do believe a NVQ 5 is equivelant.
Onwards and upwards.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Simo 79
My my, this has got very tit for tat, each to their own i say, its all about being competent to carry out a job i.e employment and continueing to learn. I could pass comments on many things said in this post but wouldn't want to add to the playground atmosphere which seems to have developed today.
Have a break, take a breath and then resume normal business.
Simo
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Carolyn Issitt
Rommel
I do hope you are not inferring by your posting that there is any difference between the CMIOSH status of a member who acheived CMIOSH via IPD Routes 1, 2 or indeed 3.
The whole point of the IPD process is to ensure members who successfuly complete the programme are fully competent Chartered Safety and Health Practitioners however they achieve their Graduate status. There is only one designation CMIOSH not cmiosh.
Carolyn Issitt
Membership Development Manager IOSH
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Barrie (Badger) Etter
Tit for tats aside, I've noticed that most NVQ4's were completed with 13 units. With aplogies Adams777 I'm on my fourteenth unit, a sort of Hons to my Diploma (NVQ4 Occ Health & Safety) on environmental issues [Unit H16 - 416]... has anyone covered this unit? I need inspiration having completed half of and found myself practically repeating the content because of the course content.
As an aside on a training session a few years back I met a couple of directors who said they would pick a NVQ trained person over uni degree because the former new how to work twice as hard as the ex student. Because the NVQer had to do a days work PLUS the NVQ.
Badger
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rob T
Just as a matter of interest - has anyone ever failed to get NVQ level 4 if they've completed all their required components?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sen Sar
Rob T
I had a module returned to rewrite as it was too "succinct".
Sar
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By A Campbell
My own view is...
people who go via degree route choos to attain academic qualifacation... Those who go down the NVQ route have to show evidence of how they personally have dealt with issues etc. Thus is also a practical and theory (to complete the section) they also must know how systems are defined/resolved?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rommel
Carolyn
That is not what I was referring to, in fact I was saying the opposite, there is no difference.
CMIOSH status is the same in whichever way it is achieved and that is why I deliberately wrote CMIOSH in small letters in the second line of my previous posting.
Now for goodness sake, can we please put an end to this nonsense?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By IOSH Moderator
This thread has now been locked as it is no longer addressing the original question which asked; "is the NVQ4 qualification equivalent to a degree and the Level 5 equivalent to a Masters Degree." This enquiry would appear to have been answered with a range of views, and is now not specifically taking into consideration the original question that was first posted.
IOSH Moderator
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.