Rank: Guest 
|
Posted By riskybizz
Is it still a requirement to use the F91 register?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
This is no longer a mandatory format, but the F91 books are still available for use.
The Work at Height Regs (Schedules) require 7 day Inspections to be recorded - what better way than to use the old F91A?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By graeme12345
or u could make your own up from schedule 7 in WAH regs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
If you do use old F91 format books/forms they will not comply with the various schedules for inspection set out in such as the WAH regs. Develop your own based around the old F91 format but extended to include the additional information.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kirsty Davies2
Riskybizz,
F91 is not required now.
In order to fulfil the requirements of Work at Height Regulations 12 & 13 as well as schedule 7, inspections can be recorded by other means ( to ensure the statutory check have been carried out).
Kirsty
(P.S. can you plz mail me)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By riskybizz
Thanks for all the helpful comments and advice, i actually have inspection report forms complying with regulation 12, the post was inspired by a third party comment made as to its "requirement"
PS: Kirsty, where do i mail you to?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By riskybizz
OOops..i DO know where to mail to....sorry
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Having looked again at the old F91A (still widely in use for 7 day scaffold inspections) and compared it with Schedule 7 of WAHR2005, I can't really see where there is a difference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Ron
Main areas are in timimg the report and the fault notification and rectification matters. It is easy enough to create as a word table using the various schedule headings that it reallhy does not need to be a significant problem. I did like some of the guidance in the old registers though!
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Arran Linton - Smith
If I recall F91a did not meet the requirements of schedule 8 the Construction, Health, Safety and Welfare Regulations back in 1996 and that was even before the introduction of the Work at Height Regulations.
Even HSG 150 published in 2001 does not make any reference to F91! There is no statutory document which replaced this document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Thanks for the response RobertK - I guess I's better start a phased withdrawal of F91s!
(I do have an MS Word WAHR05 compliant version ready).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SNS
Ron, would you be so kind as to make your layout available to me?
Just sending our in-house team on refreshers / initial training for the putting up and taking down etc of tube ands clip and tower scaffolding.
TIA
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Yes, but I can't see your e-mail address?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
A kind soul has provided me with a copy of a booklet GS 0307 "Records of Reports of Inspection" which is in effect an up-to-the-minute WAHR compliant version of the old F91A.
It even has the equivalent guidance that RobertK was fond of!
It was the booklet format of the old F91s which made them so appealling and I'm delighted to have found this format again. Single page sheets are IMHO too easily 'lost' on Sites.
The Booklet is copyright to Enfield Safety Supplies as part of their "Safepak" series and my copy here came from a local safety kit supplier.
I have no interest or affiliation with Enfield. Other published documents of this type may be avialable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.