Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 September 2009 14:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Leo26 Hi Everyone, Is anyone aware of any impending changes to PUWER? I have just tried to order a copy of the regs and have been advised that HSE have been out of stock for the last month, expecting delivery mid October. It has been suggested to our buyer that it will be coming obsolete......... Any ideas, I wasn't aware of any updates to PUWER. Leo26
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 September 2009 14:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Meiklejohn In case you did not know. It is available to download free of charge, from the HSE Website.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 September 2009 14:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Meiklejohn Sorry thought you meant the ACOP. I don't know of any intended changes to the regs.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 September 2009 14:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin Reeves Blimey, that's quick - only came into force in November 2006 ..... Colin (Okay - I work in an odd industry .. see SI 2006 No 2183)
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 September 2009 09:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH Hi Leo The response that you got may be related to the incoming EU Directive that will replace the existing EU Machinery [Safety] Directive in December this year. So far as I'm aware though, there haven't even been consequential changes proposed for the UK Machinery [Safety] Regs, let alone PUWER [but keep an eye out for them] Frank Hallett
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 September 2009 09:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Frank, You must have missed seeing the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008 (S.I. 2008/1597). I'm not aware of any proposed changes to PUWER though. Peter
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 September 2009 10:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Leo26 Thanks all for your help. Leo26
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 September 2009 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH Thank you for the ever-so-gentle reminder Peter; I'm happy to be corrected on this. It was there in the hyperspace corner of my brain but it simply didn't connect at the time. Knowing something doesn't necessarily mean remembering it accurately, or even at all, it seems. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#9 Posted : 22 September 2009 12:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Frank, I find that knowing something is not necessarily the same as being aware of it! The changes most likely to affect readers of this forum include two additional types of machinery. These are: (a) Construction site hoists intended for lifting persons or persons and goods;3 (b) Portable cartridge-operated fixing devices. As far as I can tell the final text of the guidance on the UK regs is not yet published, but there's a useful "Explanatory Memorandum" at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/s.../uksiem_20081597_en.pdf. Peter
Admin  
#10 Posted : 22 September 2009 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi There cannot be a final explanatory memorandum published without the final version of the regulations! The latest "supply of machinery" regulations can be accessed at:- http://www.opsi.gov.uk/s...pdf/uksi_20081597_en.pdf PUWER are the "user" regulations and the machinery safety regulations primarily deal with "supply"
Admin  
#11 Posted : 22 September 2009 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Wayne Changes to EN 954-1 have been given a further three year grace period. Regards
Admin  
#12 Posted : 22 September 2009 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Wayne, Be careful - the decision by the Commission to extend the presumption of confomity of EN 954-1 has been rescinded, and will be discussed again on the 7th/8th December. PM me if you want more details. Peter
Admin  
#13 Posted : 23 September 2009 10:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton Just a thought: Why is anyone trying to 'order copies of the regs' from HSE? I wouldn't do that - I'd go to: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1998/19982306.htm And download a copy for myself for free. And if my clients needed a copy - I'd give them the link. Steve
Admin  
#14 Posted : 23 September 2009 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi This appears to be a case of miscommunication at some level! The free down-loadable version of L 22, i.e the PUWER Regs, ACoP & Guidance on the HSE Books website is the 2008 "Edition" at:- http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/l22.pdf It has a preface that highlights some specifics, but it is only in context of the effect of some of the amending regulations and that the references to other publications have been updated! Health and Safety Regulations and the accompanying ACoP material cannot be amended without undergoing a consultation process.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 24 September 2009 16:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barrie (Badger) Etter Steve Go with Jays answer, every time I start to read an SI feeling (Yawwwnnn) drowsy and feel the need to drop of to ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz. zzz Where was I, oh yes, your clients are more likely to read the ACoP than the SI as its tadge more helpful thean a SI. Badger
Admin  
#16 Posted : 24 September 2009 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton I did say '...if the client needed...'. And yes, it would make sense to me to get the full AcoP/Guidance and whatever (free from HSE) if I wanted to read and understand something (Rather than just the regs free from OPSI). And I'd always try and persuade clients to read the ACoP rather than the regs, or better yet pay me to paraphrase them! (Trust me I'm a consultant..) My question was why anybody is still paying for stuff that can be got for free for most legitimate purposes. But, as always, I have read the original post. The question asked related purely to the regs. It did not mention the ACoP. So any discussion of the AcoP (and everything else) is off-topic (albeit perhaps interesting). If this were a NEBOSH exam, most posters would not have scored many marks -they have not read the question. And they have wasted time answering a question that was not asked. Sorry - and to answer your next question - YES I'm wearing my Mr Grumpy hat this afternoon! Steve
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.