IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Company fining employees for not wearing PPE
Rank: Forum user
|
What are the employment law legal implications for this?
Can a company stop money out of wages (say £10 if an employee is found not to be wearing hi vis vest)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
They might be able but what would be the point? The duty is on the employer to provide PPE and to ensure it is used where provided. Offenders should be dealt with through the company disciplinary process.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks Ray,
I get what your saying and you are right. I just need to know if it is legal in the first place (ive been asked the question). My initial gut instinct is that an employer cannot do this (an employee could end up working for nothing, contract of employment etc) but I need to know why?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
If you talk to your HR/Payroll department you will be told you can't make deductions without prior agreement. In a past life I worked in Payroll and the software often miscalculated, resulting in discussions and agreements on getting back as little as a few quid.
I doubt the individual would give you permission for taking money out of their pay for not wearing their PPE. You might be able to explore other financial methods, but deducting from pay isn't a viable one I'm afraid.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ermmm doesn't that link actually say in effect that an employer CAN make deductions, i.e. the bits after it says "Your employer is not allowed to make a deduction from your pay or wages unless:
As for the original question, no I don't think that they can withhold money in the scenario that has been placed before us, and I suggest the discplinary route.
I would also add that employees have duties as well!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I'll be Devils Advocate here.
I think it's a perfectly legitimate move provided it's agreed in writing beforehand. Many organisations already reward their employees for wearing the correct PPE (a weekly spot check to see if an individual is wearing the PPE in accordance with the SSoW gets a £50 cheque) so conversely why not fine somebody for not wearing it?
I anticipate that this might be difficult to get past the TUs though.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The question, as put shouldn't even be considered.
Failure to wear PPE is a breach of Section 7, HSWA, Reg 14 MHSW and PPE regs. Therefore the employers shouldn't just 'fine' the employee, but take vclear action.
By just running the fine system and allowing employees to work without PPE if they are willing to pay up if caught the employer is endorsing the 'non' use of PPE so is criminally liable.
Tony.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In some countries practices such as fines for employee non-compliance with h&s is the norm. However, here in the UK we tend to be a bit more, er...civilised. We also have many laws which deal with specific issue like PPE, contracts of employment and so on.
Failure for an employee to wear PPE could be a breach of s7, HSWA, however it is rarely used by the prosecuting authorities. One would need to establish WHY the employee(s) is not wearing PPE in the first instance - a minor point which may have been overlooked!
If a pecuniary sanction was part of the contract of employment, albeit unlikely, then a deduction could be made as a result of a disciplinary hearing for example. Whether that would be fair and just may be down to an employment tribunal to decide. Not sure whether the original post was a hypothetical question or not?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
No, my understanding is that a company does not have the legal power to issue a fine. It could issue warnings, etc if it already has the correct procedures in place. By following the procedures correctly,This could and should eventually result in dismissal.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Seamus,
You would have to have the Fourt Courts as your avatar ;0)
Are we talking a ROI or an NI/UK scenario?
If we are talking an ROI scenario, and they haven't signed a contract agreeing to this course of action (fines etc), then tell them to contact NERA who will come down and deal with the matter in an extremely forceful manner.
If they have signed a contract agreeing to these fines, then they have to abide by those terms.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The answer to the original post must be entirely dependant on the legal system applicable in the territory. To answer from a UK or ROI standpoint is likely to be misleading to a reader subject to employment law in Idaho, Iceland or Istanbul.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Stuff, how did you come up with Idaho, in all fairness!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
zoltangera wrote:What are the employment law legal implications for this?
Can a company stop money out of wages (say £10 if an employee is found not to be wearing hi vis vest)[/quote
Indeed the answer would depend on the laws of the land, because the £ in mentioned it may indicate the UK, Idaho would seem to be excluded as the currency there seems to be the Dollar. I am not aware of any area where a company can issue fines, a fine suggests a breach of criminal law. Where the legal system is based on the Common Law, I understand that the criminal law does require the guilt of the accused to be proven beyond all resonably doubt, and can only be given by someone with the lawful authority.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Same here, I assumed £10 was UK but in fairness you never know. Hey, lets cut to the chase, fining for this isn't really the right approach is it? Skinning cats!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If they are not using the PPE just remove them from the workplace & leave the rest to HR
Don't get involved in disipline issues
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Walker,
Excellent point, thats what HR are there for
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
And there I was thinking for all these years that it was a managers job to manage health and safety. I didn't realise it was down to HR!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
The disciplining of errant staff is within the remit of HR was the point being made.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Phil Rose wrote:And there I was thinking for all these years that it was a managers job to manage health and safety. I didn't realise it was down to HR!
Phil, you are correct but why isn't the manager ensuring the job is being done competetly (ie PPE in place).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I don't particularly like using the quote button but the post above was
"If they are not using the PPE just remove them from the workplace & leave the rest to HR"
To my mind that is a nonsense. If people are not wearing their PPE or otherwise not following safety instructions etc, that is very much a management responsibility. You need to look for the reasons why they aren't etc etc etc as has been discussed. To simply pass a health and safety matter onto to HR is a nonsense.
And I hate to say it but discipline and disciplinary aren't the sole domain of HR either. They may need to advise, but again I suggest that discipline and discplinaries are actually a management responsibility, although in some cases the process will be supported by HR. HR themselves don't actually normally discipline, they support it.
By the way, my role resides in HR!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I have no personal experience of this, but my feeling would be that you'd need to be 100% sure that the employer had met their obligations to the employee before pursuing disciplinary action against them - that is, that the PPE is compatible, fit for purpose, right for the work, etc. Yes, there is of course an onus on the staff to raise issues, but particularly in the current climate, employees might be unwilling to raise problems with supplied equipment in case they fear being singled out as troublemakers.
There could be reasons why it's not being used, rather than they just don't want to (I realise this argument would be more appropriate to some types of PPE than others).
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Now I have to discuss "Payroll" normally is the total of gross wages, commissions, and, bonuses, inclusive of whatever an employee earns in monetary terms and after deduction for (pension contributions, loan repayments, Student loan deductions) paid in terms of salary for the work they had performed for the company. If you want more information and your answer you can read this blog. I hope you will get good results. Visit: Payroll
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
4 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
4 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanked - again. Amazing how some manage to dredge up threads from the distant past. [No, I realise that the bot has some software to help them]
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Company fining employees for not wearing PPE
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.