Rank: Super forum user
|
|
2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
Kate on 12/08/2021(UTC), Kate on 12/08/2021(UTC)
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
Kate on 12/08/2021(UTC), Kate on 12/08/2021(UTC)
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Roundtuit Agreed changing the filters would be "work" and if Covid were to be contracted during such activity this would be work-related. Would still have the problem of proving that Covid (or something else) had been contracted then rather than from some other sources. As regards the London Underground experiment if would be interesting to see what trials had been undertaken before a decision to invest in technology on 200 escalator rails, which in itself would be a tiny fraction of all the rails on LUL escalators (even before starting on the handrails on stairs!!). On the basis that each escalator has rails on each side, that't only 100 escalators. Wouldn't be surprised if one of the major overground/underground interchanges has 100 escalators and travellators at a single station.
So, I suppose if say Kings Cross has 100 escalators and travellators (some operated by Network Rail) you might be able to construct a rrial that might produce statistically significant results to compare rates of Covid amongst commuters into different London termini, subject to the assumption that user take up of the "Hold onto the handrail" rule is similar in each terminus. But, you would have to check that none of the rail operators messed up the trial. If e.g. GWR installed similar at Plymouth, Bristol and Swindon, then the absence of such technology at Paddington might produce skewed results. Can we expect an investigation into links between those selling this to Government and other agencies and political donations?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I love the fact that they say in the article that the HSE says UV and fogging may be useful in controling covid but fail to quote the bit that says "People should not enter rooms being treated by UV or disinfectants applied as fog, mist or vapour" i doubt the picture of the robot in the railway sation emits enough UV to have any difference. If it did then it would probably also cause skin cancer!
Snake oil sales man indeed!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Watch this space for legal action after someone trips over a robot UVing a station or primary school.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.