Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Kloppite  
#1 Posted : 18 August 2021 12:38:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Kloppite

Good Afternoon All

We have engaged a local 360 degree excavator driver and machine to take up some concrete slabs for us. I have asked him for his insurance and copy of his NPORS card with which he obliged.

When I asked for the RaMs he Insisted that because he is only working day work and not on a price, he doesnt need RaMs and we should supply them because he is working under our umbrellaand instruction.

My boss out of desperation wants to believe the excavator driver.

Can I show him the popular concensus on this please ?

peter gotch  
#2 Posted : 18 August 2021 14:53:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Kloppite - given that the plant operator only controls the operation of the plant and probably not even its hire, and certainly not the environment in which the excavator is being used, my view is that you should probably be the ones controlling documentation that affects not only the excavator operator.

Incidentally, I don't think the terms for payment are relevant.

P

thanks 1 user thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
Kate on 18/08/2021(UTC)
Gerry Knowles  
#3 Posted : 18 August 2021 15:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Gerry Knowles

I am guessing that he is a one man (person) band, and is working on the assumption that as he has less than five employees he does not need a written health and safety system.  If he is I think that he has misssed the point a little.  He has probably been saying that that he does not need one for a long time. 

You have contracted him to carry out works on your premises, which in this case uses a excavator to dig out some concrete slabs.  If,  I was running the job, I would expect him to submit a risk assessment for the work he is going to do including all the control measures he has to put in place before excavation can start, like the identification of utility services (water, gas, sewage, power) and how he will interact with your operations such as local traffic, pedestrians, buildings etc.  He in conjunction with you should identify where the removed concrete is to be stored or if it is to be directly loaded into a skip or vehicle where they are going to park.  This is not an exhaustive list.  In his method statement he should identify how he is going to carry out the work, and how he will deal with any unexpected circumstances such as buried hazardous waste etc.  He should do all this prior to the work being started.  You should agree both of the documents and sign them off before the work commences. 

So would I want him to do a risk assessment yes I would.  

I hope this is helpful

Edited by user 18 August 2021 15:09:00(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Roundtuit  
#4 Posted : 18 August 2021 15:55:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

The stable door should be kept firmly shut until opened.

No good asking for RAMS after they have been engaged.

If your manager wants to let this machine loose without a plan better be ready with the full list of emergency numbers including a good solicitor.

thanks 4 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
Kate on 18/08/2021(UTC), mihai_qa on 19/08/2021(UTC), Kate on 18/08/2021(UTC), mihai_qa on 19/08/2021(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#5 Posted : 18 August 2021 15:55:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

The stable door should be kept firmly shut until opened.

No good asking for RAMS after they have been engaged.

If your manager wants to let this machine loose without a plan better be ready with the full list of emergency numbers including a good solicitor.

thanks 4 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
Kate on 18/08/2021(UTC), mihai_qa on 19/08/2021(UTC), Kate on 18/08/2021(UTC), mihai_qa on 19/08/2021(UTC)
Kloppite  
#6 Posted : 18 August 2021 15:56:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Kloppite

Originally Posted by: Gerry Knowles Go to Quoted Post

I am guessing that he is a one man (person) band, and is working on the assumption that as he has less than five employees he does not need a written health and safety system.  If he is I think that he has misssed the point a little.  He has probably been saying that that he does not need one for a long time. 

You have contracted him to carry out works on your premises, which in this case uses a excavator to dig out some concrete slabs.  If,  I was running the job, I would expect him to submit a risk assessment for the work he is going to do including all the control measures he has to put in place before excavation can start, like the identification of utility services (water, gas, sewage, power) and how he will interact with your operations such as local traffic, pedestrians, buildings etc.  He in conjunction with you should identify where the removed concrete is to be stored or if it is to be directly loaded into a skip or vehicle where they are going to park.  This is not an exhaustive list.  In his method statement he should identify how he is going to carry out the work, and how he will deal with any unexpected circumstances such as buried hazardous waste etc.  He should do all this prior to the work being started.  You should agree both of the documents and sign them off before the work commences. 

So would I want him to do a risk assessment yes I would.  

I hope this is helpful

We have carried out all the enableing works, Cat and Gen Scan, Heras Fencing  and RaMs for our side of the works. All we want is the operators Method Statement and Risk Assessments. He is under the impression that because he is working under our instruction and is not the main contractor he does not need them.

Kate  
#7 Posted : 18 August 2021 16:56:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

He may not "need" RAMS but you, the client, do need RAMS. One of you has got to produce it.  Or even better, you could produce it together as each of you has part of the picture (he knows about his machine and you know about the environment, task and site rules).

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.