Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
LisaVictoria  
#1 Posted : 25 April 2023 16:45:13(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
LisaVictoria

Good evening,

I noticed the sentence below whilst reviewing a procedure:

There is a requirement to report the subsequent death of an employee who dies as a result of a reportable injury within one year of the incident.

I'm struggling to find anything that confirms this, so thought I'd see if anyone could advise.

Many thanks

Lisa

 

John D C  
#2 Posted : 25 April 2023 17:39:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John D C

It is in RIDDOR 2013.-- Work-related fatalities 6.—(1) Where any person dies as a result of a work-related accident, the responsible person must follow the reporting procedure. (2) Where any person dies as a result of occupational exposure to a biological agent, the responsible person must follow the reporting procedure. (3) Where an employee has suffered an injury reportable under regulation 4 which is a cause of his death within one year of the date of the accident, the employer must notify the relevant enforcing authority of the death in an approved manner without delay, whether or not the injury has been reported under regulation 4.
A Kurdziel  
#3 Posted : 26 April 2023 08:12:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

“There is a requirement to report the subsequent death of an employee who dies as a result of a reportable injury within one year of the incident.” , is wrong, because it implies that you can wait for upto a year before reporting a workplace fatality. If someone dies at work due to an injury you must report it as soon as possible.  If they die upto a year  AFTER the incident has taken place, as a result of  THAT incident,  then you must report it is a soon as possible.

thanks 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
peter gotch on 26/04/2023(UTC)
Kate  
#4 Posted : 26 April 2023 10:36:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

I wouldn't go so far as to so say it's wrong, because it could be read either way.  That is of course a problem in itself.   I think such an ambiguously worded procedure could do with rewriting for clarity.

thanks 2 users thanked Kate for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 26/04/2023(UTC), peter gotch on 26/04/2023(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.