Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

5 Pages<1234>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#41 Posted : 10 August 2004 21:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason Touraine
Yes. I rather liked his:

'put paid to all littoral swordsman and swordswomen'.

'littoral swordsman'? Must be something to do with fighting them on the beaches! Brilliant repartee, indeed!
Admin  
#42 Posted : 11 August 2004 10:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Jason

What contribution do you want to make to my light-hearted commentary – or are you ‘hitchin a ride’ as usual and enamoured with a quote from a master of oratory.

For those that can I say, give it a go - give the readership a little original thought, although I did read somewhere that there are in the natural order, followers and leaders.

Where do you stand or this exemplified by the last comment, er?



Hello Simone

Yes mate but isn’t it a case of “time and place”.

As far as being a windbag, I am a bit taken aback. What a suggestion, to express any sentiment or opinion by the application of good grammar cannot be considered a literary offence, surely? Perhaps pigeon English might have been more appropriate?

Hey if you got it, flaunt it.

The commentary in respect of the Swiss (with a capital) is an Aussie saying about craft in the manner of “he was as crafty as a dunny rat”. “More moves than a Swiss watch” – crafty, and being literary ‘Anti-Christs’ - rabid as a pack of pit bulls. Strike me pink how long have you been marooned in the ‘Old Dart’.

Are you sure you’re an Aussie, or a sheep in sheep’s clothing, ah I have it a ‘blown away kiwi’, ‘am I right or am I right’, (quote from the singing detective).


Richard
Admin  
#43 Posted : 11 August 2004 11:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Webster
If this thread is turning into quotation corner, then perhaps Disraeli summed it up when he remarked of Gladstone "The Honorable Gentlemen is intoxicated by the exuberance of his innate verbosity"

Me, I prefer the wisdom of Popeye "Eyes had all eye can stands, an eye can't stands no more!!"

:-)

John

PS pass the spinach
Admin  
#44 Posted : 11 August 2004 15:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Aston
No offence Richard and I enjoyed your response, but I think you've missed the point of what both Jason and Simone were picking up in your literary diatribe!

Try a dictionary for the difference between literal and littoral and you might get Jason's.....

I agree with the chocolate idea. Just about time for my afternoon bar now.

BIG HUG for Corrina

Heather
Admin  
#45 Posted : 11 August 2004 15:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
John

And your point is what?

Richard
Admin  
#46 Posted : 11 August 2004 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Thank you for pointing out the oversight, in my literary discourse, but get over it people.

If I were perfect then I be wearing a long white gown with a golden aura around my head, speak Yiddish, be worshipped by millions and wouldn’t need critics, as I would be expounding the word. Trail blazing that is.

For all those that spotted my deliberate mistake take a bow or if your a Sheila then the equivalent.

I’m not sure about the chocolate; doesn’t that in exciting the endorphins cause further excitement? I thought the main point was stress mitigation?

John, if your hero is Popeye, then seek help quickly! I don’t know that the rest of us consider him anything of a literary icon.

Richard
Admin  
#47 Posted : 11 August 2004 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Pearson
I can't bite my tongue any more. Much as I enjoy reading your messages, Richard, peppering them with long words does not make for good grammar. Then there's the punctuation and spelling! You may, as you claim, be a master of "oratory", but that refers to spoken language, so we'll never know.

Talk about calling a spade "a manually-operated earth-inverting garden implement"!
Admin  
#48 Posted : 11 August 2004 16:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lewis T Roberts
Richard may go on about whinging poms but in my experience I have never met an aussie that hasn't whinged constantly. When they are in the UK the weather is bad, the chocolate not good, the pay is poor. When they travel around back packing to experience cultures they often tread on it and mostly all you hear about is many times they visited the toilet in Thailand. And that drone of australian internation where everything sounds like a question. Worst of all my children are picking it up.

Richard you are entitled to your views but do you really have to be so acidic?

Lew
Admin  
#49 Posted : 11 August 2004 23:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Neil

As I said before – a true measure of intelligence is ‘original thought’. I don’t appear to have heard any wisdom or well argued point(s) in any chat page recently.

To deride a contributor because of the use of a particular verb or adjective in favour of another is bizarre in the extreme. Secondly, this is not an examination page, so if you not able to look past the odd error then seek help, something to do with being a…. retentive.

What type of grammar I chose is frankly my decision.

Scoffing, criticising, jeering, or sarcastic and unprofessional comments aimed at a fellow contribution are of no interest except to the ego of person that wrote them.

Is this a classic case of being “a legend in your own mind” (Clint Eastwood)

Let’s have some original commentary, or does that require a journey into the unknown?

Richard
Admin  
#50 Posted : 12 August 2004 07:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Corrina Evans
Heather, thanks.
Richard,
I never doubted for one moment that you were human, and I'm sure you have a gre3at sense of humor. I have a quote for you "Men of few words are the best men" Shakespeare.
Regards Corrina
Admin  
#51 Posted : 12 August 2004 08:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Lewis Yes and No!

In an effort to defuse your inflammatory comments may I make the following comments (clearly there is little choice in the matter, in reality).

The first part of your commentary, well lets face it, the cost of living, cost of housing, cost of petrol, cost of food, rates, taxes are all disproportionately higher than the ‘land downunder’. That’s why generations immigrated to escape the wanton exploitation of the proletariat. History recorded this as a fact, no doubt that unionism had its genesis in the toll puddle martyrs and in Dillon Thomas’s ‘How Green is (was) My Valley” for a very good reason, I mean didn’t Karl Mark write his dissertation on communism in England. Look at all the lefties that resided around Tyne and Liverpool as well as Brummy land. That’s not including South Wales and the London Docks.

Look at the reminders that remain of an inglorious exploitation of the people and the land, that’s if you were lucky enough to own a home (terraced in the main) and it was NOT leasehold (no such thing as leasehold in Oz).

This is not the case in Australia; we don’t have the dark satanic mills and the various graphic prose written by Blake that describes Victorian and Edwardian Britannia of the day.

Therefore when an Aussie lands in the ‘motherland’ only to be confronted by these remnant Dickensian images, on a dark, or rainy and dark, or a rainy dark and sub zero day, he can’t help but have a bit of a gripe, who’d blame them. Particularly as they might have just come from the great southern land – They are telling you something but clearly the message cannot or will not get home! I mean to say how can you judge the merit of the comment if you are not in a position to judge for yourself. That would be deemed in my book to be biased.

On the question of the Aussie Drone as you put it, your kids have got good taste I say. But have a look around at the other influences of culture that have crept up on you in the past 10 years. In truth your moaning about the great Aussie Drone is the worst of your worries, when you consider what confronts the next generation of Brits who will have by then developed accents which will be less Midlands but more a cross between “Up the Jungle” with Windsor Davis and Serbian/Croatian/Albanian/Pakistani/Hindu/West Indian etc etc, with the language and cultures that now call Britain home, strewth (Aussie spelling) mate well hardly be able to understand you, let alone read the writing.

Get real Lew – The bit you can’t handle is that in truth us Aussies are keeping your heritage and native tongue alive mate, and no mistake. So instead of ‘slagging us off’ you should be making a pilgrimage to your future to the great land of Oz.
Richard
Admin  
#52 Posted : 12 August 2004 08:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Good’ day Corinna

But isn’t there now doubt that he actually wrote this stuff.

Secondly, in response, "if you burn your light under a bushel, then that's were it will stay”.

Thanks for your thoughtfulness but on this occasion I must decline and suggest that it would be more suited to a Nepalese recluse or a Buddhist monk.

In case there is any danger of being misrepresented, I am neither.

Richard


Admin  
#53 Posted : 12 August 2004 10:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Aston
So, finally in an effort to get back to the POINT of this thread.

I completely agree with Corrina that this can be a most "stressful" (in the common usage of the word) job at times. Working in an office with other safety professionals I have found that the best way to relieve that stress is to have a good whinge and a good laugh about it together. A problem shared.... and all that.

I can imagine that if you're the only safety professional in your office this couold be a problem.

We already seem to have a self-help group going here in these forums and I suggest that those who need to let off steam continue to post here even if it is with their tongue firmly in their cheek.

It always helps to know that someone else shares your point of view, or at the very least can sympathise with it.

Perhaps we should start a special BIG HUG thread and those who pride themselves on being stressed or don't want to listen to "whingeing Poms" or "whining Aussies" need not look in it at all.

Finally a mantra for safety professionals:

We are the unwilling lead by the unknowing, doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much for so long with so little that we're now qualified to do anything with nothing.

Heather
Admin  
#54 Posted : 12 August 2004 10:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Corrina Evans
Heather,
Loved your mantra, I shall use it in my training session this afternoon! The amount of feedback from this posting is quite amazing, and something new every day.
I wasn't expecting this much response-I'm impressed !
Regards Corrina
p.s big hug to everyone out there who wants one!
Admin  
#55 Posted : 12 August 2004 12:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Pearson
Yep, how we choose to use grammar is our own business, and I'm in no better position to cast stones than anyone else. But if you will proclaim to the forum how great your language skills are, and do so in bad English...

I'm sorry, but it's hard not to rise to the bait when you make it so easy! I don't mean to deride anyone, Richard, I'm just playfully challenging what you've said.

I'm finding this thread a great source of stress relief. Not only are we discussing the problem, but I'm getting some light relief out of it at the same time!
Admin  
#56 Posted : 12 August 2004 13:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
Heather,

thankyou for your mantra. I'am printing it in large type now and it will go up on the office wall.

As not everyone will be reading this thread may I invite you to start a new one just to give the mantra wider exposure (and to ask if there are any others about) ?

Thanks

Merv
Admin  
#57 Posted : 12 August 2004 14:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lewis T Roberts
Richard I have no axe to grind here. I am just expressing my opinion from my experiences. Generations did migrate to Aus for those reasons you state. However lets not forget that in the historical times you are talking about Aus as a dumping ground for our criminals. The backpackers I have met (and many) are not interested in buying houses and those who buy cars don’t insure them, rates and taxes are in fact proportionate to Aus. You talk about exploitation as though generations of Aussies haven’t carried out that same exploitation of the indiginous populations and the land and continue to do so. The time I am speaking about is now not Blakes time. You are 100 years late. Dark, rainy sub-zero days is part of the weather system here not too much we can do about that. I for one enjoy the differences. The message that Aus is best for everything is exactly what I was talking about in not experiencing the culture but treading on it and faulting it and comparing it to what you think you know. Everyone knows what to expect when they get here, why come if it is so bad. I don’t have kids, I have children. I embrace different cultures as it breaks down barriers and discourages ignorance. All those cultures have been embraced by Britain in the main and makes for an enriched and diverse multi-culture that has been going on for generations and not the past 10 years.I would rather we kept our heritage on this side of the pond thanks and you can keep yours ( and we know what that is). I need not make pilgrimages as I own property and holiday there and after holidaying I look forward to going home. Again I was not slagging off Austalians I was making an observation. You seem to imply that it is the Aussies that made Australia great, when in fact much of what is great is the natural surroundings and what is blighting it is the people and its ignorance of other cultures and diversities. It remains that you appear to be over critical and voice it as if it were fact.

Lew
Admin  
#58 Posted : 12 August 2004 14:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Neil,

Perhaps Richard's inability to express himself coherently is in itself a symptom of stress - brought on maybe by taking up an untenable position on the subject in question.

;-)

Admin  
#59 Posted : 13 August 2004 03:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Jonathan

What part of my commentary do you consider was incoherent?

Secondly, in order to make these remarks you must be in a position to do so.

The brevity and obscurity of your contributions are significant in their absence.

Think about this saying:

“Judge not, least ye be judged”.

My education background is on record at IOSH care to check it out?

In order to set yourself up as as a literary critic in contributions to this chat page I suggest you give more examples of your competency and ‘not put foot in mouth before putting brain into gear’.

Hey, “I’m Loose” (quote: Col Jack O’Neil – Stargate)

Richard
Admin  
#60 Posted : 13 August 2004 03:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Lew

Was that the largest motion you have ever made, It seems it might have been the de-stressor you needed - feel better now, it seems it took a lot of energy?

Lighten up mate!

I reiterate look into your own backyard before casting aspersions on the land down under. You mentioned you had property here. So I can checkout the veracity of this claim? In what state and council is your rate notice issued. I would consider it an honour to ‘check it out’.

Look in the dictionary and you will realise that it is quite acceptable to describe children, siblings, offspring, the produce of one’s loins as ‘kids’. Where have you been in the last 20 years?

To enlighten you, Australia was not made up of felons, and cast off from an unfair BRITISH judicial only - the majority of people who built this country were free settlers. So I suggest you also check out British modern history as clearly you need to get your facts straight.

The early settlers handed down a legacy to us, that was, not to recreat the same class ridden, poverty stricken society that I mentioned which saw children in the mines and dark static mills of early economic history. The felons you speak of were in the main the poor who were convicted for things like ‘stealing a loaf of bread’ because they were starving. If you look at the migration boom it took place between the 1950 and 1970’s. This trend would have continued unabated had the Federal Government restricted migration. Talk about ‘rats leaving a sinking ship’.

Be reminded that Silicosis was rife in the mining industry and lead poisoning rife where this material was used.

Your presumably smug attitude relies on a very short memory. Well let me remind you. You're recent prosperity was founded on the economic reforms that rebuilt Europe, led by the French, that the average Brit despises and the Germans who were the once the hated enemy. It was at this point the Brits dropped Australia and the rest of the Commonwealth.

Face facts mate, and don't attempt to 'guild the lily'.

It could be your already on the Yellow Brick Road and who knows what equation of no heart, no brain and no courage will equate to, I suggest it = 0

The land of Aus was made by working people and people with vision, not usury, gin and a rigid class system.

Cleary, history particularly British was not your forte. This leads me to conclude, based on the evidence that “empty vessels do indeed make the most noise”.


Love two, your serve!

Richard
Admin  
#61 Posted : 13 August 2004 09:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Aston
Jonathan - I thought that was a model of both brevity and non-obscurity, but then I was a science graduate so what do I know?

Lew & Richard - while this has been most entertaining, it's got just a tiny weeny bit Off Topic, considering it's supposed to be about stress. May I respectfully suggest you start a new thread on "bashing the colonials" or "My country is better than your country, nyah, nyah, nyah" or better still come and join the rest of us in the mantra thread and chill out.

(Sticks head quickly back below parapet)

Heather

"Thank you, we're all refreshed and challennged by your unique point of view"
Admin  
#62 Posted : 13 August 2004 13:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Goodstadt
"You're recent prosperity was founded on the economic reforms that rebuilt Europe, led by the French, that the average Brit despises and the Germans who were the once the hated enemy"

Richard - what do you mean "who were once the hated enemy". You perhaps don't see our tabloids whenever there is a european football match - for them the war isn't over yet.



Admin  
#63 Posted : 13 August 2004 14:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lewis T Roberts
Richards

There you go again trying to throw your opinions around as if it were fact and as if it were some kind of competition. Puffing out your chest and quoting passages from literary figures in an attempt to prove your intelligence, how sad, have you none of your own? It is tedious. What a funny little man you are. And no you can’t have my property details.

Game over

Lew
Admin  
#64 Posted : 13 August 2004 14:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Heather

Long live science, I have science degrees and maybe because of this I like to push the envelope.

I will take the offer and see what's happening on the mantra thread. See you soon.

Richard
Admin  
#65 Posted : 13 August 2004 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
James

Good point, at least it takes the heat out of the Australia v Lions battle.

Richard
Admin  
#66 Posted : 13 August 2004 14:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Lew

What a pathetic response on behalf of Albion.

Sounds like you're going to ‘take your ball back' cos' I scored a penalty.

Scorn dear chap is usually left to the Sheila’s. We blokes at least have the sense to battle it out.

Is it a case of “quick to scorn and slow to praise”.

Where’s your sense of honour?

You remind me of Tom Crachett with only one pair of socks, and nary a darning hob in sight. I feel I’ve dealt you a mortal blow.

Perseverance made Britannia great, suppose you were behind the door when they handed out 'bottle'.

How un-British.

Duce?

Richard
Admin  
#67 Posted : 13 August 2004 14:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Aston
Richard

You said "Scorn dear chap is usually left to the Sheila’s. We blokes at least have the sense to battle it out."

Maybe this is true in Australia. I've never been there so I won't judge by what I see on a web forum. However in England in the 21st century we women don't quite get left in the kitchen and denied an education any more. Some of us have been to University (gasp) and got professional qualifications (double gasp). Some of us even have LATIN O LEVEL (Triple gasp)

Some of us are even capable of a little bit of witty repartee and come-back. I don't feel the need to pour on the scorn yet, but I shall certainly let you know if I do.

:-)

Heather

"I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a ****."


Admin  
#68 Posted : 13 August 2004 14:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Heather

That was not meant for you, but if the cap fit and you want to be a victim so be it.

On the topic of travel. All the Brits I have talked to, friends etc have never regretted the move or the chance to experience the good life.

Richard
Admin  
#69 Posted : 13 August 2004 15:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Byatt
Careful Richard,

surely a comment like "scorn is usually left to the Sheilas" is aimed at all sheilas reading the thread?

James
Admin  
#70 Posted : 13 August 2004 15:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Aston
Richard

You said "That was not meant for you, but if the cap fit and you want to be a victim so be it."

Blimey.

1. Your comment referred in disparaging tones to "sheilas". I take this to mean females of the species although I am not fluent in Aussie. I am a female of the species last time I looked, therefore it applies as much to me as to any other woman here.

2. I am no-one's victim - certainly not yours. I am merely someone trying for a bit of intelligent debate rather than dismising 50% of the population in a single sweeping generalisation.

You obviously have some strong views on certain topics - good for you, the world would be a duller place if we all agreed - but can we refrain from descending into personal insults at every turn?

You have a nice weekend - perhaps it's time for some of those shrimps on the barbie?

Heather



Admin  
#71 Posted : 13 August 2004 15:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Lee
Acceptable use guidelines (IOSH Forum)

Users must not antagonise other users of this service or post any information that could be considered defamatory, obscene, abusive or unlawful. You may be held liable for the content you post.

Admin  
#72 Posted : 13 August 2004 15:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Saunders
Dear Corrina, we are all guilty sometimes of thinking that we are a lone voice crying in the wilderness,thanks for proving that I am not. Group hug? certainly, Dave (just about got some hair-my 6 month old granddaughter has more) Saunders.
Admin  
#73 Posted : 13 August 2004 15:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Archer.
Re: Richard

Summed up quickly

He's a wind up merchant who's only happy when he is fishing and reeling in the benefits of his bait.

Happy sailing Richard (or should that be fishing?)
Admin  
#74 Posted : 13 August 2004 15:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad
RE Richard
I think I can provide a shorter (one-word) summary. But common decency shal prevail and prevent me from giving public air to my thoughts.
Fats
"If you want to run with the dogs, don't p*ss with the puppies"
Admin  
#75 Posted : 13 August 2004 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Zoe Barnett
Sorry, but just one word makes up my mind for me in the Australia vs UK debate. That word is "poisonous." As in snake, jellyfish and spider.

To go back to the stress issue - I'm feeling very bruised at the moment due to an ongoing debate I'm having with external agencies. I'm lucky in that my managers and colleagues are supporting me but it's still a worrying time. It's not helped by being one of only three H&S professionals in a very big organisation. It's hard to see how else this can be handled because in the end it's my professional opinion and my professional neck being stuck out and so at the end of the day I'm very much on my own!

This must be another aspect of stress for us to consider other than the when-are-the-idiots-going-to-listen type of pressure that I think was the origin of this thread.

So if there are any big hugs going, or even better any chocolate, please send them this way :(

"Remember, sometimes the dragon eats the knight"



Admin  
#76 Posted : 13 August 2004 15:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Aston
((((((HUG))))))) for Zoe

I know how you feel - it can be very frustrating especially if you get a "jobsworth" lined up against you. I've only had it happen once with an HSE Inspector who was determined to "go by the book" even though she knew nothing about my industry and had no clue what she was talking about.

I don't think she'd ever been in a rubber factory in her whole life and boy did it show - she had no clue about what was "reasonably practicable".

At the time it was a bad situation because it made me look like I was in the wrong in front of managers who expected me to be their expert advisor. Luckily, like you I had their support and stuck to my guns because I was confident that I was right.

Despite much bluster and bluff about writing to the company - we never heard from that inspector again.... and I have to say that most Inspectors I have dealt with have been the exact opposite of her.

Hang in there and if you can back up your position with any documentary evidence, guidance notes, etc then do so.

Good luck.

Heather
Admin  
#77 Posted : 13 August 2004 16:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Pearson
SQUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEZZZEE [pop]. Whoops, sorry Zoe, don't know my own strength!
Admin  
#78 Posted : 13 August 2004 16:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Pearson
Anyone else here read the novel "Gould's Book of Fish"? The exchange about Australia's history reminded me. It's about Tasmania way back when prison camps were being set up for naughty poms. Really grim depictions of prison camp life but a first rate book, completely unforgettable. Very weird too.
Admin  
#79 Posted : 13 August 2004 16:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Zoe Barnett
At the risk of getting thrown out by the moderators I can recommend "The Floating Brothel" - about the first female convicts sent out in the 1780s. A tribute to female resilience.
Admin  
#80 Posted : 14 August 2004 03:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Reality is a stress raiser and, I like some, face it on a daily basis.

I don’t work for one organisation I work for many and therefore there is a need to get involved in the politics of each organisation I consult to. For instance, I started a contract with a company that has no SWMS no site safety plans, and no operational documentation to control the local OHS requirements. All they have is a corporate OHS management system full of guess what, you got it – motherhood statements. Plenty of what you need to do but a big fat zero on how to do it.

My brief was to provide this, and I might add not for the good of the people although that will eventually have good outcomes, no, it was to ensure the GM of this section of the company was able to demonstrate to other GMs at the annual general meeting that he is legislative compliant - That’s reality.

I also consult to the legal profession in worker compensation, workplace injury and public liability claims. This is where you see reality. Its not about honour or justice, it’s always about the money. The average settlement is always minus about $60,000 for fees.


The reality is and it might be stressful to some to learn that it has always been about the money.

For instance a mining operation below ground, prior to sinking Millions of dollars/pounds into the enterprise the shareholders must complete a financial risk assessment of expected work case scenarios, which include the potential for injury and fatalities – if the business risk is to high, from a human perspective they will either can the idea or move it offshore (remembering Bhopal).

This still does not stop the enterprise because costed into the operational profit of the enterprise is the risk of settlements as a results of prosecution in statute and Plaintiff action in the case of common law.

Let’s face it we as safety professionals do not control the dollars the client or CEO does. This might cause some to become stressed and develop a feeling of little worth but I reiterate what you can do about it without causing yourself to become a target and force management to face issues they don’t want to hear about.

It is after all, their responsibility as the employer representative, not ours and to further reiterate providing you have given the best advice possible and sought to back this up with a second professional opinion and documented the issues then without taking to the Unions or the HSE or relevant authority that’s as far as it goes, if you want to keep your sanity and/or job.

The role of safety professional is a job just like any other, its what we do, and some of us do it with outstanding success, but at the end of the day irrespective of our personal feeling we don’t have the moral or legal obligation and we don’t have to make the decisions that will please the board the CEO does.

So let’s see a little perspective particularly the “people’s party of chocolate eating, feminists and SNAG huggists”, take another look at reality and though different eyes and you might find then answer to your own stress issues – put yourself in the CEO’s place for a week.

There has been some terrific quotes on the Mantra page, and in this instance it might be the case that the safety advisor takes his or her own advice, words to the effect, “…have the wisdom to accept the things that can be changed and the things that are not in your power to change...”.

Finally, ask yourself this, if I were not passionate about this issue, would I stick to you psyche quite so much?

At the end of the day that’s were stress is resolved.

Hey I’m loose!

Richard
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
5 Pages<1234>»
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.